CVE-2009-4385 json
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Scriptsez.net Ez Poll Hoster (EPH) allow remote attackers to (1) hijack the a…
published 16y ago modified 4mo ago also EUVD-2009-4353
- cvss
- 6.8
- version 2.0, NVD
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- 1.0%
- EPSS 1.0% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 61%
- public exploits
- 1
- Exploit-DB
Summary
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Scriptsez.net Ez Poll Hoster (EPH) allow remote attackers to (1) hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that delete polls via the delete_poll action to index.php; and hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (2) delete users via the manage action to admin.php, or (3) send arbitrary email to arbitrary users in the email action to admin.php.
Is CVE-2009-4385 in your stack? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.
Check with FencerTimeline
- First public exploit (EDB-10439)
- Published
Exploit prediction
0.97% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 61% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-09).
Exploits and checks
- EDB-10439 Ez Poll Hoster - Multiple Cross-Site Scripting / Cross-Site Request Forgery Vulnerabilities webapps, 2009-12-14
- packetstormsecurity.org http://packetstormsecurity.org/0912-exploits/ezpollhoster-xssxsrf.txt referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified
CVSS scores
| assigned by | version | score | vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVD | 2.0 | 6.8 | AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P |
Classification
- Weakness
-
- CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery
References
-
exploit-db.com
/exploits/10439
exploit
-
packetstormsecurity.org
/0912-exploits/ezpollhoster-xssxsrf.txt
exploit
-
vupen.com
/english/advisories/2009/3529
vdb-entry, vendor-advisory
-
secunia.com
/advisories/37716
third-party-advisory, vendor-advisory
Sources
- CVE List CVE-2009-4385
- NVD CVE-2009-4385
Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.