CVE-2009-5022 json
Heap-based buffer overflow in tif_ojpeg.c in the OJPEG decoder in LibTIFF before 3.9.5 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code vi…
published 15y ago modified 4mo ago also EUVD-2009-4980
- cvss
- 6.8
- version 2.0, NVD
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- 11.7%
- EPSS 11.7% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 96%
- public exploits
- 1
- Exploit-DB
Summary
Heap-based buffer overflow in tif_ojpeg.c in the OJPEG decoder in LibTIFF before 3.9.5 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted TIFF file.
Patch / fix
- tiff Debian 14, Debian 13, Debian 12 3.9.5-1
debian advisories DEBIAN-CVE-2009-5022
- libtiff RHEL 6 3.9.4-1.el6_0.3
red hat advisories RHSA-2011:0452
Is CVE-2009-5022 in your stack? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.
Check with FencerVendor advisories
What the vendors themselves say about their products: affected, fixed or not affected, and what to do.
red hat product security vex CVE-2009-5022 updated cvss 6.8
libtiff ojpeg buffer overflow
-
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop (v. 6) libtiff 3.9.4-1.el6_0.3 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop Optional (v. 6) libtiff 3.9.4-1.el6_0.3 Red Hat Enterprise Linux HPC Node (v. 6) libtiff 3.9.4-1.el6_0.3 Red Hat Enterprise Linux HPC Node Optional (v. 6) libtiff 3.9.4-1.el6_0.3 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 6) libtiff 3.9.4-1.el6_0.3 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 6) libtiff 3.9.4-1.el6_0.3fixed: vendor fix RHSA-2011:0452
+2 more productsfewer
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation (v. 6) libtiff 3.9.4-1.el6_0.3 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation Optional (v. 6) libtiff 3.9.4-1.el6_0.3 -
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 libtiff Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 libtiffnot affected: vulnerable code not present
Red Hat CSAF VEX © Red Hat, Inc., from https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/; changed: reduced to product statuses and remediations. CC BY 4.0 · csaf
Timeline
- Published
- First public exploit (EDB-22681)
Exploit prediction
11.71% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 96% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-09).
Exploits and checks
- EDB-22681 IrfanView - '.TIF' Image Decompression Buffer Overflow dos, 2012-11-13
- openwall.com http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/04/12/10 referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified
- bugzilla.maptools.org http://bugzilla.maptools.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1999 referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified
- bugzilla.redhat.com https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=695885 referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified
CVSS scores
| assigned by | version | score | vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVD | 2.0 | 6.8 | AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P |
Classification
- Weakness
-
- CWE-119 Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer
References
-
remotesensing.org
/libtiff/v3.9.5.html
patch
-
openwall.com
/lists/oss-security/2011/04/12/10
mailing-list, exploit
-
bugzilla.maptools.org
/show_bug.cgi?id=1999
exploit
-
bugzilla.redhat.com
/show_bug.cgi?id=695885
exploit
-
debian.org
/security/2011/dsa-2256
vendor-advisory
-
mandriva.com
/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2011:078
vendor-advisory
-
security.gentoo.org
/glsa/glsa-201209-02.xml
vendor-advisory
-
lists.fedoraproject.org
/pipermail/package-announce/2011-April/058478.html
vendor-advisory
-
ubuntu.com
/usn/USN-1120-1
vendor-advisory
-
redhat.com
/support/errata/RHSA-2011-0452.html
vendor-advisory
-
secunia.com
/advisories/44271
third-party-advisory, vendor-advisory
-
vupen.com
/english/advisories/2011/1014
vdb-entry, vendor-advisory
-
vupen.com
/english/advisories/2011/1082
vdb-entry, vendor-advisory
-
exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com
/vulnerabilities/66774
vdb-entry
-
securitytracker.com
/id?1025380
vdb-entry
-
securityfocus.com
/bid/47338
vdb-entry
-
secunia.com
/advisories/50726
third-party-advisory
Sources
- CVE List CVE-2009-5022
- NVD CVE-2009-5022
Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.