CVE-2010-0647 in the critical feed json
WebKit before r53525, as used in Google Chrome before 4.0.249.89, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code in the Chrome sandbox v…
published 16y ago modified 4mo ago also EUVD-2010-0678
- cvss
- 9.3
- version 2.0, NVD
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- 3.9%
- EPSS 3.9% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 90%
- public exploits
- 0
- none known
Summary
WebKit before r53525, as used in Google Chrome before 4.0.249.89, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code in the Chrome sandbox via a malformed RUBY element, as demonstrated by a <ruby>><table><rt> sequence.
Patch / fix
Is CVE-2010-0647 in your stack? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.
Check with FencerVendor advisories
What the vendors themselves say about their products: affected, fixed or not affected, and what to do.
red hat product security vex CVE-2010-0647 updated
webkit: remote arbitrary code execution via malformed RUBY element
-
Red Hat All currently supported Red Hat productsnot affected: vulnerable code not present
Red Hat CSAF VEX © Red Hat, Inc., from https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/; changed: reduced to product statuses and remediations. CC BY 4.0 · csaf
Exploit prediction
3.88% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 90% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-09).
CVSS scores
| assigned by | version | score | vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVD | 2.0 | 9.3 | AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C |
Classification
- Weakness
-
- CWE-94 Improper Control of Generation of Code
- Technology feeds
References
-
googlechromereleases.blogspot.com
/2010/02/stable-channel-update.html
patch
-
mandriva.com
/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2011:039
vendor-advisory
-
ubuntu.com
/usn/USN-1006-1
vendor-advisory
-
lists.opensuse.org
/opensuse-security-announce/2011-01/msg00006.html
vendor-advisory
-
sites.google.com
/a/chromium.org/dev/Home/chromium-security/chromium-security-bugs
vendor-advisory
-
vupen.com
/english/advisories/2010/0361
vdb-entry, vendor-advisory
-
secunia.com
/advisories/38545
third-party-advisory, vendor-advisory
-
oval.cisecurity.org
/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A14094
vdb-entry, signature
-
securityfocus.com
/bid/38177
vdb-entry
-
osvdb.org
/62317
vdb-entry
-
vupen.com
/english/advisories/2010/2722
vdb-entry
-
secunia.com
/advisories/43068
third-party-advisory
-
secunia.com
/advisories/41856
third-party-advisory
-
vupen.com
/english/advisories/2011/0212
vdb-entry
-
exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com
/vulnerabilities/56214
vdb-entry
-
securitytracker.com
/id?1023583
vdb-entry
- bugs.webkit.org /show_bug.cgi?id=33266
-
vupen.com
/english/advisories/2011/0552
vdb-entry
- trac.webkit.org /changeset/53525
- code.google.com /p/chromium/issues/detail?id=31692
Sources
- CVE List CVE-2010-0647
- NVD CVE-2010-0647
Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.