CVE-2010-0742 json
The Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) implementation in crypto/cms/cms_asn1.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8o and 1.x before 1.0.0a does not prop…
published 16y ago modified 4mo ago also EUVD-2010-0768
- cvss
- 7.5
- version 2.0, NVD
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- 7.8%
- EPSS 7.8% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 94%
- public exploits
- 0
- none known
Summary
The Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) implementation in crypto/cms/cms_asn1.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8o and 1.x before 1.0.0a does not properly handle structures that contain OriginatorInfo, which allows context-dependent attackers to modify invalid memory locations or conduct double-free attacks, and possibly execute arbitrary code, via unspecified vectors.
Patch / fix
- openssl Debian 14, Debian 13, Debian 12 1.0.0e-1
debian advisories DEBIAN-CVE-2010-0742
- openssl-1_1 openSUSE Tumbleweed 1.1.1l-1.2
opensuse advisories openSUSE-SU-2024:11127-1
Is CVE-2010-0742 in your stack? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.
Check with FencerVendor advisories
What the vendors themselves say about their products: affected, fixed or not affected, and what to do.
red hat product security vex CVE-2010-0742 updated cvss 6.8
openssl: invalid ASN1 module definition for CMS
-
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 openssl, openssl-perlnot affected: vulnerable code not present
Red Hat CSAF VEX © Red Hat, Inc., from https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/; changed: reduced to product statuses and remediations. CC BY 4.0 · csaf
Exploit prediction
7.83% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 94% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-09).
CVSS scores
| assigned by | version | score | vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVD | 2.0 | 7.5 | AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P |
Classification
- Weakness
-
- CWE-310 Cryptographic Issues
- Technology feeds
References
-
vupen.com
/english/advisories/2010/1313
vdb-entry, patch, vendor-advisory
-
marc.info
/?l=bugtraq&m=129138643405740&w=2
vendor-advisory
-
secunia.com
/advisories/40024
third-party-advisory, vendor-advisory
-
secunia.com
/advisories/40000
third-party-advisory, vendor-advisory
- rt.openssl.org /Ticket/Display.html?id=2211&user=guest&pass=guest
-
secunia.com
/advisories/42724
third-party-advisory
-
oval.cisecurity.org
/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A12395
vdb-entry, signature
-
securityfocus.com
/bid/40502
vdb-entry
- www-01.ibm.com /support/docview.wss?uid=ssg1S1004564
-
vupen.com
/english/advisories/2010/3105
vdb-entry
-
lists.balabit.com
/pipermail/syslog-ng-announce/2011-January/000101.html
mailing-list
- cvs.openssl.org /filediff?f=openssl/crypto/cms/cms_asn1.c&v1=1.8&v2=1.8.6.1
-
secunia.com
/advisories/57353
third-party-advisory
-
lists.balabit.com
/pipermail/syslog-ng-announce/2011-January/000102.html
mailing-list
- bugzilla.redhat.com /show_bug.cgi?id=598738
- kb.bluecoat.com /index?page=content&id=SA50
-
secunia.com
/advisories/42733
third-party-advisory
-
secunia.com
/advisories/42457
third-party-advisory
- cvs.openssl.org /chngview?cn=19693
- openssl.org /news/secadv_20100601.txt
Sources
- CVE List CVE-2010-0742
- NVD CVE-2010-0742
Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.