CVE-2010-2055 json
Ghostscript 8.71 and earlier reads initialization files from the current working directory, which allows local users to execute arbitrary P…
published 16y ago modified 4mo ago also EUVD-2010-2075
- cvss
- 7.2
- version 2.0, NVD
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- 0.5%
- EPSS 0.5% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 43%
- public exploits
- 0
- none known
Summary
Ghostscript 8.71 and earlier reads initialization files from the current working directory, which allows local users to execute arbitrary PostScript commands via a Trojan horse file, related to improper support for the -P- option to the gs program, as demonstrated using gs_init.ps, a different vulnerability than CVE-2010-4820.
Patch / fix
- ghostscript Debian 14, Debian 13, Debian 12 8.71~dfsg2-6.1
debian advisories DEBIAN-CVE-2010-2055
- ghostscript RHEL 5 8.70-6.el5_7.6
- ghostscript RHEL 6 8.70-11.el6_2.6
- ghostscript-gtk RHEL 5 8.70-6.el5_7.6
- ghostscript-gtk RHEL 6 8.70-11.el6_2.6
red hat advisories RHSA-2012:0095
Is CVE-2010-2055 in your stack? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.
Check with FencerVendor advisories
What the vendors themselves say about their products: affected, fixed or not affected, and what to do.
red hat product security vex CVE-2010-2055 updated cvss 4.4
ghostscript: gs_init.ps searched in current directory despite -P-
-
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (v. 5 server) ghostscript 8.70-6.el5_7.6, ghostscript-gtk 8.70-6.el5_7.6 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop (v. 5 client) ghostscript 8.70-6.el5_7.6, ghostscript-gtk 8.70-6.el5_7.6 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop (v. 6) ghostscript 8.70-11.el6_2.6 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop Optional (v. 6) ghostscript 8.70-11.el6_2.6, ghostscript-gtk 8.70-11.el6_2.6 Red Hat Enterprise Linux HPC Node (v. 6) ghostscript 8.70-11.el6_2.6 Red Hat Enterprise Linux HPC Node Optional (v. 6) ghostscript 8.70-11.el6_2.6, ghostscript-gtk 8.70-11.el6_2.6fixed: vendor fix RHSA-2012:0095
+5 more productsfewer
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 6) ghostscript 8.70-11.el6_2.6 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 6) ghostscript 8.70-11.el6_2.6, ghostscript-gtk 8.70-11.el6_2.6 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation (v. 6) ghostscript 8.70-11.el6_2.6 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation Optional (v. 6) ghostscript 8.70-11.el6_2.6, ghostscript-gtk 8.70-11.el6_2.6 Red Hat RHEL Desktop Workstation (v. 5 client) ghostscript 8.70-6.el5_7.6 -
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 ghostscriptnot affected: vulnerable code not present
Red Hat CSAF VEX © Red Hat, Inc., from https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/; changed: reduced to product statuses and remediations. CC BY 4.0 · csaf
Exploit prediction
0.51% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 43% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-09).
Exploits and checks
- securityfocus.com http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/511474 referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified
- securityfocus.com http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/511472 referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified
- bugs.ghostscript.com http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691339 referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified
CVSS scores
| assigned by | version | score | vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVD | 2.0 | 7.2 | AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C |
Classification
- Weakness
-
- CWE-17 DEPRECATED: Code
References
-
bugzilla.redhat.com
/show_bug.cgi?id=599564
patch
-
securityfocus.com
/archive/1/511474
mailing-list, exploit
-
securityfocus.com
/archive/1/511472
mailing-list, exploit
-
bugs.ghostscript.com
/show_bug.cgi?id=691339
exploit
-
rhn.redhat.com
/errata/RHSA-2012-0095.html
vendor-advisory
-
security.gentoo.org
/glsa/glsa-201412-17.xml
vendor-advisory
-
lists.fedoraproject.org
/pipermail/package-announce/2010-July/043948.html
vendor-advisory
-
lists.opensuse.org
/opensuse-security-announce/2010-08/msg00001.html
vendor-advisory
-
lists.fedoraproject.org
/pipermail/package-announce/2010-July/043913.html
vendor-advisory
-
secunia.com
/advisories/40532
third-party-advisory, vendor-advisory
-
vupen.com
/english/advisories/2010/1757
vdb-entry, vendor-advisory
-
secunia.com
/advisories/40452
third-party-advisory, vendor-advisory
-
secunia.com
/advisories/40475
third-party-advisory, vendor-advisory
-
osvdb.org
/66247
vdb-entry
- bugs.debian.org /cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=583183
- bugs.debian.org /cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=583316
-
securityfocus.com
/archive/1/511476
mailing-list
- savannah.gnu.org /forum/forum.php?forum_id=6368
-
securityfocus.com
/archive/1/511433
mailing-list
- bugs.ghostscript.com /show_bug.cgi?id=691350
- bugzilla.novell.com /show_bug.cgi?id=608071
Sources
- CVE List CVE-2010-2055
- NVD CVE-2010-2055
Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.