CVE-2010-2067 json
Stack-based buffer overflow in the TIFFFetchSubjectDistance function in tif_dirread.c in LibTIFF before 3.9.4 allows remote attackers to ca…
published 16y ago modified 4mo ago also EUVD-2010-2086
- cvss
- 6.8
- version 2.0, NVD
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- 4.8%
- EPSS 4.8% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 91%
- public exploits
- 0
- none known
Summary
Stack-based buffer overflow in the TIFFFetchSubjectDistance function in tif_dirread.c in LibTIFF before 3.9.4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a long EXIF SubjectDistance field in a TIFF file.
Patch / fix
- libtiff libtiff 3.9.4
- tiff Debian 14, Debian 13, Debian 12 3.9.4-1
debian advisories DEBIAN-CVE-2010-2067
- tiff openSUSE Tumbleweed 4.0.7-1.1
opensuse advisories openSUSE-SU-2024:10554-1
Is CVE-2010-2067 in your stack? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.
Check with FencerVendor advisories
What the vendors themselves say about their products: affected, fixed or not affected, and what to do.
red hat product security vex CVE-2010-2067 updated cvss 7.5
libtiff: SubjectDistance EXIF tag reading stack based buffer overflow
-
Red Hat All currently supported Red Hat productsnot affected: vulnerable code not present
Red Hat CSAF VEX © Red Hat, Inc., from https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/; changed: reduced to product statuses and remediations. CC BY 4.0 · csaf
Exploit prediction
4.79% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 91% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-09).
CVSS scores
| assigned by | version | score | vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVD | 2.0 | 6.8 | AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P |
Classification
- Weakness
-
- CWE-119 Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer
References
-
slackware.com
/security/viewer.php?l=slackware-security&y=2010&m=slackware-security.596424
vendor-advisory, third-party-advisory
-
ubuntu.com
/usn/USN-954-1
vendor-advisory, third-party-advisory
-
security.gentoo.org
/glsa/glsa-201209-02.xml
vendor-advisory, third-party-advisory
-
lists.opensuse.org
/opensuse-security-announce/2010-08/msg00001.html
vendor-advisory, mailing-list, third-party-advisory
-
secunia.com
/advisories/40241
third-party-advisory
-
bugzilla.maptools.org
/show_bug.cgi?id=2212
issue-tracking, third-party-advisory
-
marc.info
/?l=oss-security&m=127731610612908&w=2
mailing-list, third-party-advisory
-
vupen.com
/english/advisories/2010/1638
vdb-entry, third-party-advisory
-
osvdb.org
/65676
vdb-entry, broken-link
-
remotesensing.org
/libtiff/v3.9.4.html
broken-link
-
bugzilla.redhat.com
/show_bug.cgi?id=599576
issue-tracking, third-party-advisory
-
labs.idefense.com
/intelligence/vulnerabilities/display.php?id=874
third-party-advisory, broken-link
-
secunia.com
/advisories/40381
third-party-advisory
-
secunia.com
/advisories/50726
third-party-advisory
Sources
- CVE List CVE-2010-2067
- NVD CVE-2010-2067
Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.