Stack-based buffer overflow in SigPlus Pro 3.74 ActiveX control allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long eighth argumen…

published 2010-08-04 16y ago modified 2026-06-16 4mo ago also EUVD-2010-2935

cvss: 9.3; version 2.0, NVD
cisa kev: Not listed; not in CISA's catalog
epss: 9.4%; EPSS 9.4% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 95%
public exploits: 1; Exploit-DB

Stack-based buffer overflow in SigPlus Pro 3.74 ActiveX control allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long eighth argument (HexString) to the LCDWriteString method.

Is CVE-2010-2931 in your stack? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.

Check with Fencer

Timeline

2010-07-31 First public exploit (EDB-14514)
2010-08-04 Published

Exploit prediction

9.37% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 95% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-09).

Exploits and checks

EDB-14514 SigPlus Pro 3.74 - ActiveX 'LCDWriteString()' Remote Buffer Overflow JIT Spray (ASLR + DEP Bypass) remote, 2010-07-31

CVSS scores

assigned by	version	score	vector
NVD	2.0	9.3	AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C

Classification

Weakness

CWE-119 Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer

References

exploit-db.com /exploits/14514
exploit
secunia.com /advisories/40818
third-party-advisory, vendor-advisory
oval.cisecurity.org /repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A11304
vdb-entry, signature
exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com /vulnerabilities/60839
vdb-entry

Sources

CVE List CVE-2010-2931
NVD CVE-2010-2931

Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.