CVE-2010-3082 json
Cross-site scripting in django
published 16y ago modified 4mo ago also GHSA-fxpg-gg9g-76gj , PYSEC-2010-12 , EUVD-2010-0001
- cvss
- 6.1
- version 3.1, GitHub
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- 1.9%
- EPSS 1.9% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 80%
- public exploits
- 0
- none known
Summary
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Django 1.2.x before 1.2.2 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a csrfmiddlewaretoken (aka csrf_token) cookie.
Patch / fix
- pypi django 1.2.2
- python-django Debian 14, Debian 13, Debian 12 1.2.3-1
debian advisories DEBIAN-CVE-2010-3082
Is CVE-2010-3082 in your dependencies? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.
Check with FencerVendor advisories
What the vendors themselves say about their products: affected, fixed or not affected, and what to do.
red hat product security vex CVE-2010-3082 updated
Django CSRF flaw
-
Red Hat All currently supported Red Hat productsnot affected: vulnerable code not present
Red Hat CSAF VEX © Red Hat, Inc., from https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/; changed: reduced to product statuses and remediations. CC BY 4.0 · csaf
Exploit prediction
1.92% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 80% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-09).
CVSS scores
| assigned by | version | score | vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVD | 2.0 | 4.3 | AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N |
| GitHub | 3.1 | 6.1 | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N |
Affected packages
| ecosystem | package | affected | fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| pypi | django | >=1.2, <1.2.2 |
1.2.2 |
Classification
- Weakness
-
- CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation
- Technology feeds
References
-
securityfocus.com
/bid/43116
vdb-entry, patch, web
-
djangoproject.com
/weblog/2010/sep/08/security-release/
patch, vendor-advisory, article
-
github.com
/django/django/commit/7f84657b6b2243cc787bdb9f296710c8d13ad0bd
web
-
ubuntu.com
/usn/USN-1004-1
vendor-advisory, web, advisory
-
exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com
/vulnerabilities/61729
vdb-entry, web
-
marc.info
/?l=oss-security&m=128403961700444&w=2
mailing-list, web
-
bugzilla.redhat.com
/show_bug.cgi?id=632239
web, report
-
nvd.nist.gov
/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-3082
advisory
-
github.com
/advisories/GHSA-fxpg-gg9g-76gj
advisory
-
github.com
/django/django
package
-
github.com
/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/django/PYSEC-2010-12.yaml
web
-
djangoproject.com
/weblog/2010/sep/08/security-release
web
Sources
- CVE List CVE-2010-3082
- GitHub Advisory GHSA-fxpg-gg9g-76gj
- NVD CVE-2010-3082
- OSV PYSEC-2010-12
Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.