Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in pixelpost 1.7.3 could allow remote attackers to change the admin password.

published 2019-11-12 6y ago modified 2026-06-16 4mo ago also EUVD-2010-3303

cvss: 8.8; version 3.1, NVD
cisa kev: Not listed; not in CISA's catalog
epss: 1.0%; EPSS 1.0% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 63%
public exploits: 0; none known

Is CVE-2010-3305 in your stack? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.

Check with Fencer

Exploit prediction

1.01% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 63% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-09).

Exploits and checks

exploit-db.com https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/15014 referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified

CVSS scores

assigned by	version	score	vector
NVD	3.1	8.8	CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
NVD	2.0	6.8	AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

Affected products

pixelpost pixelpost

Classification

Weakness

CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery

References

exploit-db.com /exploits/15014
exploit, third-party-advisory, vdb-entry
security-tracker.debian.org /tracker/CVE-2010-3305
third-party-advisory
access.redhat.com /security/cve/cve-2010-3305
broken-link
openwall.com /lists/oss-security/2010/09/17/7
mailing-list, third-party-advisory

Sources

CVE List CVE-2010-3305
NVD CVE-2010-3305

Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.