CVE-2010-3492 json
The asyncore module in Python before 3.2 does not properly handle unsuccessful calls to the accept function, and does not have accompanying…
published 16y ago modified 4mo ago also EUVD-2010-3490
- cvss
- 5.0
- version 2.0, NVD
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- 3.4%
- EPSS 3.4% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 88%
- public exploits
- 0
- none known
Summary
The asyncore module in Python before 3.2 does not properly handle unsuccessful calls to the accept function, and does not have accompanying documentation describing how daemon applications should handle unsuccessful calls to the accept function, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct denial of service attacks that terminate these applications via network connections.
Patch / fix
- python python 3.1.2
- python2.7 Debian 11 2.7.8-11
debian advisories DEBIAN-CVE-2010-3492
- bugs.python.org/issue6706 advisory
Is CVE-2010-3492 in your stack? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.
Check with FencerVendor advisories
What the vendors themselves say about their products: affected, fixed or not affected, and what to do.
red hat product security vex CVE-2010-3492 updated cvss 5.0
python accept() implementation in async core is broken
-
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 python Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 python Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 python, tkinter, python-libs, python-test, python-toolsaffected: no fix available
Red Hat CSAF VEX © Red Hat, Inc., from https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/; changed: reduced to product statuses and remediations. CC BY 4.0 · csaf
Exploit prediction
3.39% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 88% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-09).
CVSS scores
| assigned by | version | score | vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVD | 2.0 | 5.0 | AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P |
References
-
bugs.python.org
/issue6706
patch, vendor-advisory
-
mandriva.com
/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2010:216
vendor-advisory, third-party-advisory
-
mandriva.com
/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2010:215
vendor-advisory, third-party-advisory
-
openwall.com
/lists/oss-security/2010/09/11/2
mailing-list, third-party-advisory
-
oval.cisecurity.org
/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A12111
vdb-entry, signature, third-party-advisory
-
openwall.com
/lists/oss-security/2010/09/24/3
mailing-list, third-party-advisory
-
openwall.com
/lists/oss-security/2010/09/22/3
mailing-list, third-party-advisory
-
openwall.com
/lists/oss-security/2010/09/09/6
mailing-list, third-party-advisory
Sources
- CVE List CVE-2010-3492
- NVD CVE-2010-3492
Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.