CVE-2010-3691 json
PGTStorage/pgt-file.php in phpCAS before 1.1.3, when proxy mode is enabled, allows local users to overwrite arbitrary files via a symlink a…
published 16y ago modified 4mo ago also EUVD-2010-3675
- cvss
- 3.3
- version 2.0, NVD
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- 0.4%
- EPSS 0.4% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 29%
- public exploits
- 0
- none known
Summary
PGTStorage/pgt-file.php in phpCAS before 1.1.3, when proxy mode is enabled, allows local users to overwrite arbitrary files via a symlink attack on an unspecified file.
Is CVE-2010-3691 in your stack? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.
Check with FencerVendor advisories
What the vendors themselves say about their products: affected, fixed or not affected, and what to do.
red hat product security vex CVE-2010-3691 updated cvss 4.3
phpCAS: multiple vulnerabilities fixes in 1.1.3
-
Red Hat All currently supported Red Hat productsnot affected: vulnerable code not present
Red Hat CSAF VEX © Red Hat, Inc., from https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/; changed: reduced to product statuses and remediations. CC BY 4.0 · csaf
Exploit prediction
0.35% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 29% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-09).
CVSS scores
| assigned by | version | score | vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVD | 2.0 | 3.3 | AV:L/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:P |
Classification
- Weakness
-
- CWE-59 Improper Link Resolution Before File Access
References
-
debian.org
/security/2011/dsa-2172
vendor-advisory
-
lists.fedoraproject.org
/pipermail/package-announce/2010-October/049600.html
vendor-advisory
-
lists.fedoraproject.org
/pipermail/package-announce/2010-October/049602.html
vendor-advisory
-
lists.fedoraproject.org
/pipermail/package-announce/2010-November/050428.html
vendor-advisory
-
lists.fedoraproject.org
/pipermail/package-announce/2010-November/050415.html
vendor-advisory
- bugs.debian.org /cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=495542#82
- issues.jasig.org /browse/PHPCAS-80
-
vupen.com
/english/advisories/2011/0456
vdb-entry
-
vupen.com
/english/advisories/2010/2909
vdb-entry
-
securityfocus.com
/bid/43585
vdb-entry
-
secunia.com
/advisories/42149
third-party-advisory
- forge.indepnet.net /projects/glpi/repository/revisions/12601
-
vupen.com
/english/advisories/2010/2705
vdb-entry
-
secunia.com
/advisories/43427
third-party-advisory
-
openwall.com
/lists/oss-security/2010/09/29/6
mailing-list
- developer.jasig.org /source/changelog/jasigsvn?cs=21538
-
secunia.com
/advisories/41878
third-party-advisory
-
openwall.com
/lists/oss-security/2010/10/01/5
mailing-list
-
openwall.com
/lists/oss-security/2010/10/01/2
mailing-list
-
secunia.com
/advisories/42184
third-party-advisory
Sources
- CVE List CVE-2010-3691
- NVD CVE-2010-3691
Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.