CVE-2011-0654 in the critical feed json
Integer underflow in the BowserWriteErrorLogEntry function in the Common Internet File System (CIFS) browser service in Mrxsmb.sys or bowse…
published 2011-02-16 15 y ago modified 2026-06-16 4 mo ago also EUVD-2011-0672
- cvss
- 10.0
- version 2.0, NVD
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- 68.4%
- EPSS 68.4% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 99.3%
- public exploits
- 2
- Metasploit, Exploit-DB
Summary
Integer underflow in the BowserWriteErrorLogEntry function in the Common Internet File System (CIFS) browser service in Mrxsmb.sys or bowser.sys in Active Directory in Microsoft Windows XP SP2 and SP3, Windows Server 2003 SP2, Windows Vista SP1 and SP2, Windows Server 2008 Gold, SP2, R2, and R2 SP1, and Windows 7 Gold and SP1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (system crash) via a malformed BROWSER ELECTION message, leading to a heap-based buffer overflow, aka "Browser Pool Corruption Vulnerability." NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information.
Timeline
- First public exploit (EDB-16166)
- Published
Exploit prediction
68.40% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 99.3% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-09).
Exploits and checks
- Metasploit auxiliary/dos/windows/smb/ms11_019_electbowser Microsoft Windows Browser Pool DoS metasploit auxiliary, normal rank
- EDB-16166 Microsoft Windows Server 2003 - AD BROWSER ELECTION Remote Heap Overflow dos, 2011-02-14
- securityfocus.com http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/46360 referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified
CVSS scores
| assigned by | version | score | vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVD | 2.0 | 10.0 | AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C |
Classification
- Weakness
-
- CWE-119 Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer
References
-
exploit-db.com
/exploits/16166
exploit
-
securityfocus.com
/bid/46360
vdb-entry, exploit
-
docs.microsoft.com
/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2011/ms11-019
vendor-advisory
-
vupen.com
/english/advisories/2011/0394
vdb-entry, vendor-advisory
-
vupen.com
/english/advisories/2011/0938
vdb-entry, vendor-advisory
-
secunia.com
/advisories/43299
third-party-advisory, vendor-advisory
- blogs.technet.com /b/mmpc/archive/2011/02/16/my-sweet-valentine-the-cifs-browser-protocol-heap-corruption-vulnerability.aspx
-
us-cert.gov
/cas/techalerts/TA11-102A.html
third-party-advisory, us-government-resource
-
kb.cert.org
/vuls/id/323172
third-party-advisory, us-government-resource
- blogs.technet.com /b/srd/archive/2011/02/16/notes-on-exploitability-of-the-recent-windows-browser-protocol-issue.aspx
-
securitytracker.com
/id?1025328
vdb-entry
-
archives.neohapsis.com
/archives/fulldisclosure/2011-02/0284.html
mailing-list
-
exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com
/vulnerabilities/65376
vdb-entry
-
oval.cisecurity.org
/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A12637
vdb-entry, signature
Sources
- CVE List CVE-2011-0654
- NVD CVE-2011-0654
Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.