Skip to content
Fencer Intel
medium 4.0

CVE-2011-0745 json

SugarCRM before 6.1.3 does not properly handle reloads and direct requests for a warning page produced by a certain duplicate check, which…

published 2011-03-16 15 y ago modified 2026-06-16 4 mo ago also EUVD-2011-0757

cvss
4.0
version 2.0, NVD
cisa kev
Not listed
not in CISA's catalog
epss
6.3%
EPSS 6.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 93%
public exploits
1
Exploit-DB

Summary

SugarCRM before 6.1.3 does not properly handle reloads and direct requests for a warning page produced by a certain duplicate check, which allows remote authenticated users to discover (1) the names of customers via a ShowDuplicates action to the Accounts module, reachable through index.php; or (2) the names of contact persons via a ShowDuplicates action to the Contacts module, reachable through index.php.

Timeline

  1. First public exploit (EDB-35467)
  2. Published

Exploit prediction

6.26% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 93% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-09).

Exploits and checks

  • EDB-35467 SugarCRM 6.1.1 - Information Disclosure webapps, 2011-03-15
  • redteam-pentesting.de http://www.redteam-pentesting.de/advisories/rt-sa-2011-002 referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified

CVSS scores

assigned by version score vector
NVD 2.0 4.0 AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N

Classification

Weakness
  • CWE-20 Improper Input Validation

References

Sources

Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.