CVE-2011-1680 json
ncpmount in ncpfs 2.2.6 and earlier does not remove the /etc/mtab~ lock file after a failed attempt to add a mount entry, which has unspeci…
published 2011-04-10 15 y ago modified 2026-06-16 4 mo ago also EUVD-2011-1680
- cvss
- 4.4
- version 2.0, NVD
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- 0.5%
- EPSS 0.5% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 41%
- public exploits
- 0
- none known
Summary
ncpmount in ncpfs 2.2.6 and earlier does not remove the /etc/mtab~ lock file after a failed attempt to add a mount entry, which has unspecified impact and local attack vectors.
Vendor advisories
What the vendors themselves say about their products: affected, fixed or not affected, and what to do.
red hat product security vex CVE-2011-1680 updated cvss 3.3
ncpfs: ncpmount does not remove /etc/mtab~ lock file after failed mount entry addition
-
Red Hat All currently supported Red Hat productsnot affected: vulnerable code not present
Red Hat CSAF VEX © Red Hat, Inc., from https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/; changed: reduced to product statuses and remediations. CC BY 4.0 · csaf
Exploit prediction
0.47% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 41% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-09).
Exploits and checks
- bugzilla.redhat.com https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688980 referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified
- openwall.com http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/31/3 referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified
CVSS scores
| assigned by | version | score | vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVD | 2.0 | 4.4 | AV:L/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P |
Classification
- Weakness
-
- CWE-264 Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls
References
-
bugzilla.redhat.com
/show_bug.cgi?id=688980
exploit
-
openwall.com
/lists/oss-security/2011/03/31/3
mailing-list, exploit
-
openwall.com
/lists/oss-security/2011/03/14/5
mailing-list
-
openwall.com
/lists/oss-security/2011/03/04/9
mailing-list
-
openwall.com
/lists/oss-security/2011/03/22/6
mailing-list
-
openwall.com
/lists/oss-security/2011/03/22/4
mailing-list
-
openwall.com
/lists/oss-security/2011/03/05/7
mailing-list
-
openwall.com
/lists/oss-security/2011/03/07/9
mailing-list
-
exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com
/vulnerabilities/66700
vdb-entry
-
openwall.com
/lists/oss-security/2011/04/01/2
mailing-list
-
openwall.com
/lists/oss-security/2011/03/04/10
mailing-list
-
openwall.com
/lists/oss-security/2011/03/14/16
mailing-list
-
openwall.com
/lists/oss-security/2011/03/31/4
mailing-list
-
openwall.com
/lists/oss-security/2011/03/04/12
mailing-list
-
openwall.com
/lists/oss-security/2011/03/14/7
mailing-list
-
openwall.com
/lists/oss-security/2011/03/04/11
mailing-list
-
openwall.com
/lists/oss-security/2011/03/05/3
mailing-list
-
openwall.com
/lists/oss-security/2011/03/15/6
mailing-list
Sources
- CVE List CVE-2011-1680
- NVD CVE-2011-1680
Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.