CVE-2011-4318 json
Dovecot 2.0.x before 2.0.16, when ssl or starttls is enabled and hostname is used to define the proxy destination, does not verify that the…
published 2013-03-07 13 y ago modified 2026-06-16 4 mo ago also EUVD-2011-4252
- cvss
- 5.8
- version 2.0, NVD
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- 1.3%
- EPSS 1.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 71%
- public exploits
- 0
- none known
Summary
Dovecot 2.0.x before 2.0.16, when ssl or starttls is enabled and hostname is used to define the proxy destination, does not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via a valid certificate for a different hostname.
Patch / fix
- dovecot Debian 14, Debian 13, Debian 12 1:2.0.18-1
debian advisories DEBIAN-CVE-2011-4318
- dovecot RHEL 6 1:2.0.9-5.el6
- dovecot-mysql RHEL 6 1:2.0.9-5.el6
- dovecot-pgsql RHEL 6 1:2.0.9-5.el6
- dovecot-pigeonhole RHEL 6 1:2.0.9-5.el6
red hat advisories RHSA-2013:0520
Vendor advisories
What the vendors themselves say about their products: affected, fixed or not affected, and what to do.
red hat product security vex CVE-2011-4318 updated cvss 5.8
dovecot: proxy destination host name not checked against SSL certificate name
-
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 6) dovecot 2.0.9-5.el6, dovecot-mysql 2.0.9-5.el6, dovecot-pgsql 2.0.9-5.el6, dovecot-pigeonhole 2.0.9-5.el6 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 6) dovecot 2.0.9-5.el6 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation (v. 6) dovecot 2.0.9-5.el6, dovecot-mysql 2.0.9-5.el6, dovecot-pgsql 2.0.9-5.el6, dovecot-pigeonhole 2.0.9-5.el6 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation Optional (v. 6) dovecot 2.0.9-5.el6fixed: vendor fix RHSA-2013:0520
-
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 dovecot Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 dovecotnot affected: vulnerable code not present
Red Hat CSAF VEX © Red Hat, Inc., from https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/; changed: reduced to product statuses and remediations. CC BY 4.0 · csaf
Exploit prediction
1.32% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 71% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-09).
CVSS scores
| assigned by | version | score | vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVD | 2.0 | 5.8 | AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N |
Classification
- Weakness
-
- CWE-20 Improper Input Validation
References
-
rhn.redhat.com
/errata/RHSA-2013-0520.html
vendor-advisory
-
secunia.com
/advisories/52311
third-party-advisory, vendor-advisory
-
secunia.com
/advisories/46886
third-party-advisory
- bugs.gentoo.org /show_bug.cgi?id=390887
- bugzilla.redhat.com /show_bug.cgi?id=754980
- hg.dovecot.org /dovecot-2.0/rev/5e9eaf63a6b1
-
dovecot.org
/list/dovecot-news/2011-November/000200.html
mailing-list
-
openwall.com
/lists/oss-security/2011/11/18/7
mailing-list
-
openwall.com
/lists/oss-security/2011/11/18/5
mailing-list
Sources
- CVE List CVE-2011-4318
- NVD CVE-2011-4318
Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.