CVE-2011-4603 json
The silc_channel_message function in ops.c in the SILC protocol plugin in libpurple in Pidgin before 2.10.1 does not perform the expected U…
published 2011-12-17 14 y ago modified 2026-06-16 4 mo ago also EUVD-2011-4527
- cvss
- 5.0
- version 2.0, NVD
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- 3.6%
- EPSS 3.6% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 89%
- public exploits
- 0
- none known
Summary
The silc_channel_message function in ops.c in the SILC protocol plugin in libpurple in Pidgin before 2.10.1 does not perform the expected UTF-8 validation on message data, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via a crafted message, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-3594.
Patch / fix
- pidgin Debian 14, Debian 13, Debian 12 2.10.1-1
debian advisories DEBIAN-CVE-2011-4603
- pidgin RHEL 4 2.6.6-10.el4
- pidgin RHEL 5 PRODUCTIVITY, RHEL 5 2.6.6-5.el5_7.4
- finch RHEL 4 2.6.6-10.el4
- finch RHEL 5 PRODUCTIVITY, RHEL 5 2.6.6-5.el5_7.4
- libpurple RHEL 4 2.6.6-10.el4
- libpurple RHEL 5 PRODUCTIVITY, RHEL 5 2.6.6-5.el5_7.4
- pidgin-perl RHEL 4 2.6.6-10.el4
- pidgin-perl RHEL 5 PRODUCTIVITY, RHEL 5 2.6.6-5.el5_7.4
red hat advisories RHSA-2011:1820
Vendor advisories
What the vendors themselves say about their products: affected, fixed or not affected, and what to do.
red hat product security vex CVE-2011-4603 updated cvss 4.3
pidgin: SILC remote crash on channel messages
-
Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS version 4 finch 2.6.6-10.el4, pidgin 2.6.6-10.el4, libpurple 2.6.6-10.el4, pidgin-perl 2.6.6-10.el4, libpurple-tcl 2.6.6-10.el4, libpurple-perl 2.6.6-10.el4 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop (v. 5 client) finch 2.6.6-5.el5_7.4, pidgin 2.6.6-5.el5_7.4, libpurple 2.6.6-5.el5_7.4, pidgin-perl 2.6.6-5.el5_7.4, libpurple-tcl 2.6.6-5.el5_7.4, libpurple-perl 2.6.6-5.el5_7.4 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop version 4 finch 2.6.6-10.el4, pidgin 2.6.6-10.el4, libpurple 2.6.6-10.el4, pidgin-perl 2.6.6-10.el4, libpurple-tcl 2.6.6-10.el4, libpurple-perl 2.6.6-10.el4 Red Hat Enterprise Linux ES version 4 finch 2.6.6-10.el4, pidgin 2.6.6-10.el4, libpurple 2.6.6-10.el4, pidgin-perl 2.6.6-10.el4, libpurple-tcl 2.6.6-10.el4, libpurple-perl 2.6.6-10.el4 Red Hat Enterprise Linux WS version 4 finch 2.6.6-10.el4, pidgin 2.6.6-10.el4, libpurple 2.6.6-10.el4, pidgin-perl 2.6.6-10.el4, libpurple-tcl 2.6.6-10.el4, libpurple-perl 2.6.6-10.el4 Red Hat RHEL Desktop Workstation (v. 5 client) pidgin 2.6.6-5.el5_7.4fixed: vendor fix RHSA-2011:1820
+1 more productsfewer
Red Hat RHEL Optional Productivity Applications (v. 5 server) finch 2.6.6-5.el5_7.4, pidgin 2.6.6-5.el5_7.4, libpurple 2.6.6-5.el5_7.4, pidgin-perl 2.6.6-5.el5_7.4, libpurple-tcl 2.6.6-5.el5_7.4, libpurple-perl 2.6.6-5.el5_7.4 -
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 finch, pidgin, libpurple, pidgin-perl, libpurple-tcl, libpurple-perlnot affected: vulnerable code not present
Red Hat CSAF VEX © Red Hat, Inc., from https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/; changed: reduced to product statuses and remediations. CC BY 4.0 · csaf
Exploit prediction
3.60% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 89% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-09).
CVSS scores
| assigned by | version | score | vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVD | 2.0 | 5.0 | AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P |
Classification
- Weakness
-
- CWE-20 Improper Input Validation
References
-
pidgin.im
/news/security/?id=59
patch, vendor-advisory
-
developer.pidgin.im
/viewmtn/revision/diff/c7b95cc3be0590b52edc02d4750ae62844c1acb6/with/afb9ede3de989f217f03d5670cca00e628bd11f1/
patch
-
redhat.com
/support/errata/RHSA-2011-1820.html
vendor-advisory
-
hermes.opensuse.org
/messages/13195955
vendor-advisory
- developer.pidgin.im /viewmtn/revision/info/afb9ede3de989f217f03d5670cca00e628bd11f1
-
securityfocus.com
/bid/51074
vdb-entry
-
oval.cisecurity.org
/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A18303
vdb-entry, signature
-
secunia.com
/advisories/47234
third-party-advisory
Sources
- CVE List CVE-2011-4603
- NVD CVE-2011-4603
Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.