CVE-2012-0255 json
The BGP implementation in bgpd in Quagga before 0.99.20.1 does not properly use message buffers for OPEN messages, which allows remote atta…
published 2012-04-05 14 y ago modified 2026-06-16 4 mo ago also EUVD-2012-0291
- cvss
- 5.0
- version 2.0, NVD
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- 3.5%
- EPSS 3.5% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 89%
- public exploits
- 0
- none known
Summary
The BGP implementation in bgpd in Quagga before 0.99.20.1 does not properly use message buffers for OPEN messages, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (assertion failure and daemon exit) via a message associated with a malformed Four-octet AS Number Capability (aka AS4 capability).
Patch / fix
- quagga RHEL 6 0.99.15-7.el6_3.2
- quagga-contrib RHEL 6 0.99.15-7.el6_3.2
red hat advisories RHSA-2012:1259
Vendor advisories
What the vendors themselves say about their products: affected, fixed or not affected, and what to do.
red hat product security vex CVE-2012-0255 updated cvss 2.9
(bgpd): Assertion failure by processing malformed AS4 capability in BGP OPEN message
-
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 6) quagga 0.99.15-7.el6_3.2 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 6) quagga 0.99.15-7.el6_3.2, quagga-contrib 0.99.15-7.el6_3.2 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation (v. 6) quagga 0.99.15-7.el6_3.2 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation Optional (v. 6) quagga 0.99.15-7.el6_3.2, quagga-contrib 0.99.15-7.el6_3.2fixed: vendor fix RHSA-2012:1259
-
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 quagganot affected: vulnerable code not present
Red Hat CSAF VEX © Red Hat, Inc., from https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/; changed: reduced to product statuses and remediations. CC BY 4.0 · csaf
Exploit prediction
3.45% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 89% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-09).
CVSS scores
| assigned by | version | score | vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVD | 2.0 | 5.0 | AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P |
Classification
- Weakness
-
- CWE-119 Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer
References
-
rhn.redhat.com
/errata/RHSA-2012-1259.html
vendor-advisory
-
lists.fedoraproject.org
/pipermail/package-announce/2012-April/078910.html
vendor-advisory
-
debian.org
/security/2012/dsa-2459
vendor-advisory
-
lists.fedoraproject.org
/pipermail/package-announce/2012-April/078926.html
vendor-advisory
-
lists.fedoraproject.org
/pipermail/package-announce/2012-April/078794.html
vendor-advisory
-
kb.cert.org
/vuls/id/551715
third-party-advisory, us-government-resource
-
secunia.com
/advisories/48949
third-party-advisory
Sources
- CVE List CVE-2012-0255
- NVD CVE-2012-0255
Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.