CVE-2012-2734 json
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Cumin before 0.1.5444, as used in Red Hat Enterprise Messaging, Realtime, and…
published 2012-09-28 14 y ago modified 2026-06-16 4 mo ago also EUVD-2012-2714
- cvss
- 6.8
- version 2.0, NVD
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- 0.9%
- EPSS 0.9% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 60%
- public exploits
- 0
- none known
Summary
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Cumin before 0.1.5444, as used in Red Hat Enterprise Messaging, Realtime, and Grid (MRG) 2.0, allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that execute commands via unspecified vectors.
Patch / fix
- cumin enterprise mrg 2 0.1.5444-3.el6
- condor enterprise mrg 2 7.6.5-0.22.el6
- sesame enterprise mrg 2 1.0-6.el6
- wallaby enterprise mrg 2 0.12.5-10.el6
- rubygems enterprise mrg 2 1.8.16-1.el6
- ruby-json enterprise mrg 2 1.4.6-10.el6
- condor-qmf enterprise mrg 2 7.6.5-0.22.el6
- condor-kbdd enterprise mrg 2 7.6.5-0.22.el6
red hat advisories RHSA-2012:1281RHSA-2012:1278
Vendor advisories
What the vendors themselves say about their products: affected, fixed or not affected, and what to do.
red hat product security vex CVE-2012-2734 updated cvss 4.3
cumin: CSRF flaw
-
Red Hat Enterprise MRG 1 cuminaffected: no fix planned “Will not fix”
-
Red Hat MRG Grid Execute Node for RHEL 5 Server v.2 condor 7.6.5-0.22.el5, wallaby 0.12.5-10.el5, condor-qmf 7.6.5-0.22.el5, condor-kbdd 7.6.5-0.22.el5, condor-wallaby 4.1.3-1.el5, ruby-wallaby 0.12.5-10.el5, +7 more Red Hat MRG Grid for RHEL 5 Server v.2 sesame 1.0-4.el5, cumin 0.1.5444-3.el5, condor 7.6.5-0.22.el5, wallaby 0.12.5-10.el5, condor-qmf 7.6.5-0.22.el5, condor-kbdd 7.6.5-0.22.el5, +11 more Red Hat MRG Management for RHEL 5 Server v.2 sesame 1.0-4.el5, cumin 0.1.5444-3.el5, wallaby 0.12.5-10.el5, python-wallaby 0.12.5-10.el5fixed: vendor fix RHSA-2012:1278
-
Red Hat MRG Grid Execute Node for RHEL 6 ComputeNode v.2 condor 7.6.5-0.22.el6, rubygems 1.8.16-1.el6, wallaby 0.12.5-10.el6, condor-qmf 7.6.5-0.22.el6, condor-kbdd 7.6.5-0.22.el6, condor-wallaby 4.1.3-1.el6, +9 more Red Hat MRG Grid Execute Node for RHEL 6 Server v.2 condor 7.6.5-0.22.el6, wallaby 0.12.5-10.el6, condor-qmf 7.6.5-0.22.el6, condor-kbdd 7.6.5-0.22.el6, condor-wallaby 4.1.3-1.el6, ruby-wallaby 0.12.5-10.el6, +7 more Red Hat MRG Grid for RHEL 6 Server v.2 sesame 1.0-6.el6, cumin 0.1.5444-3.el6, condor 7.6.5-0.22.el6, rubygems 1.8.16-1.el6, wallaby 0.12.5-10.el6, ruby-json 1.4.6-10.el6, +43 more Red Hat MRG Management for RHEL 6 ComputeNode v.2 sesame 1.0-6.el6 Red Hat MRG Management for RHEL 6 Server v.2 sesame 1.0-6.el6, cumin 0.1.5444-3.el6, wallaby 0.12.5-10.el6, python-wallaby 0.12.5-10.el6fixed: vendor fix RHSA-2012:1281
-
Red Hat MRG Messaging for RHEL 5 Server v.2 sesame 1.0-4.el5fixed: vendor fix RHSA-2012:1278
-
Red Hat MRG Messaging for RHEL 6 Server v.2 sesame 1.0-6.el6fixed: vendor fix RHSA-2012:1281
Red Hat CSAF VEX © Red Hat, Inc., from https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/; changed: reduced to product statuses and remediations. CC BY 4.0 · csaf
Exploit prediction
0.92% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 60% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-09).
Exploits and checks
- bugzilla.redhat.com http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=832124 referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified
CVSS scores
| assigned by | version | score | vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVD | 2.0 | 6.8 | AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P |
Classification
- Weakness
-
- CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery
References
-
bugzilla.redhat.com
/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=832124
exploit
-
rhn.redhat.com
/errata/RHSA-2012-1278.html
vendor-advisory
-
rhn.redhat.com
/errata/RHSA-2012-1281.html
vendor-advisory
-
securityfocus.com
/bid/55618
vdb-entry
-
exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com
/vulnerabilities/78775
vdb-entry
-
secunia.com
/advisories/50660
third-party-advisory
Sources
- CVE List CVE-2012-2734
- NVD CVE-2012-2734
Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.