CVE-2012-5896 in the critical feed json
The Annotation Objects Extension ActiveX control in AnnotateX.dll in Quest InTrust 10.4.0.853 and earlier does not properly implement the A…
published 2012-11-17 13 y ago modified 2026-06-16 4 mo ago also EUVD-2012-5770
- cvss
- 10.0
- version 2.0, NVD
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- 68.7%
- EPSS 68.7% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 99.3%
- public exploits
- 3
- Metasploit, Exploit-DB
Summary
The Annotation Objects Extension ActiveX control in AnnotateX.dll in Quest InTrust 10.4.0.853 and earlier does not properly implement the Add method, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a memory address in the first argument, related to an "uninitialized pointer."
Timeline
- First public exploit (Metasploit exploit/windows/browser/intrust_annotatex_add)
- Published
Exploit prediction
68.67% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 99.3% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-09).
Exploits and checks
- Metasploit exploit/windows/browser/intrust_annotatex_add Quest InTrust Annotation Objects Uninitialized Pointer metasploit exploit, average rank, 2012-03-28
- EDB-18735 Quest InTrust - Annotation Objects Uninitialized Pointer (Metasploit) remote, 2012-04-13
- EDB-18674 Quest InTrust 10.4.x - Annotation Objects ActiveX Control 'AnnotateX.dll' Uninitialized Pointer Remote Code Execution remote, 2012-03-28
- dev.metasploit.com http://dev.metasploit.com/redmine/projects/framework/repository/entry/modules/exploits/windows/browser/intrust_annotatex_add.rb referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified
- packetstormsecurity.org http://packetstormsecurity.org/files/111853/Quest-InTrust-Annotation-Objects-Uninitialized-Pointer.html referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified
- archives.neohapsis.com http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2012-03/0153.html referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified
- securityfocus.com http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/52765 referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified
CVSS scores
| assigned by | version | score | vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVD | 2.0 | 10.0 | AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C |
References
-
exploit-db.com
/exploits/18674
exploit
-
dev.metasploit.com
/redmine/projects/framework/repository/entry/modules/exploits/windows/browser/intrust_annotatex_add.rb
exploit
-
packetstormsecurity.org
/files/111853/Quest-InTrust-Annotation-Objects-Uninitialized-Pointer.html
exploit
-
archives.neohapsis.com
/archives/bugtraq/2012-03/0153.html
mailing-list, exploit
-
securityfocus.com
/bid/52765
vdb-entry, exploit
-
secunia.com
/advisories/48566
third-party-advisory, vendor-advisory
-
osvdb.org
/80662
vdb-entry
-
exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com
/vulnerabilities/74448
vdb-entry
- packetstormsecurity.org /files/111312/Quest-InTrust-10.4.x-Annotation-Objects-Code-Execution.html
Sources
- CVE List CVE-2012-5896
- NVD CVE-2012-5896
Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.