CVE-2012-6096 in the critical feed json
Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in the get_history function in history.cgi in Nagios Core before 3.4.4, and Icinga 1.6.x before 1.6.2…
published 2013-01-22 13 y ago modified 2026-06-16 4 mo ago also EUVD-2012-5966
- cvss
- 7.5
- version 2.0, NVD
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- 66.5%
- EPSS 66.5% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 99.2%
- public exploits
- 3
- Metasploit, Exploit-DB
Summary
Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in the get_history function in history.cgi in Nagios Core before 3.4.4, and Icinga 1.6.x before 1.6.2, 1.7.x before 1.7.4, and 1.8.x before 1.8.4, might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long (1) host_name variable (host parameter) or (2) svc_description variable.
Vendor advisories
What the vendors themselves say about their products: affected, fixed or not affected, and what to do.
red hat product security vex CVE-2012-6096 updated cvss 5.0
nagios: stack-based buffer overflow in history.cgi
-
Red Hat All currently supported Red Hat productsnot affected: vulnerable code not present
Red Hat CSAF VEX © Red Hat, Inc., from https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/; changed: reduced to product statuses and remediations. CC BY 4.0 · csaf
Timeline
- First public exploit (Metasploit exploit/unix/webapp/nagios3_history_cgi)
- Published
Exploit prediction
66.45% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 99.2% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-09).
Exploits and checks
- Metasploit exploit/unix/webapp/nagios3_history_cgi Nagios3 history.cgi Host Command Execution metasploit exploit, great rank, 2012-12-09
- EDB-24159 Nagios3 - 'history.cgi' Host Command Execution (Metasploit) remote, 2013-01-16
- EDB-24084 Nagios3 - 'history.cgi' Remote Command Execution remote, 2013-01-13
- securityfocus.com http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/56879 referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified
CVSS scores
| assigned by | version | score | vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVD | 2.0 | 7.5 | AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P |
Classification
- Weakness
-
- CWE-119 Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer
References
-
exploit-db.com
/exploits/24084
exploit
-
exploit-db.com
/exploits/24159
exploit
-
securityfocus.com
/bid/56879
vdb-entry, exploit
-
debian.org
/security/2013/dsa-2616
vendor-advisory
-
lists.opensuse.org
/opensuse-updates/2013-01/msg00077.html
vendor-advisory
-
lists.opensuse.org
/opensuse-updates/2013-01/msg00033.html
vendor-advisory
-
lists.opensuse.org
/opensuse-updates/2013-01/msg00088.html
vendor-advisory
-
lists.opensuse.org
/opensuse-updates/2013-01/msg00060.html
vendor-advisory
-
debian.org
/security/2013/dsa-2653
vendor-advisory
-
secunia.com
/advisories/51863
third-party-advisory, vendor-advisory
-
dev.icinga.org
/issues/3532
vendor-advisory
-
lists.grok.org.uk
/pipermail/full-disclosure/2012-December/089125.html
mailing-list
- nagios.org /projects/nagioscore/history/core-3x
- bugzilla.redhat.com /show_bug.cgi?id=893269
-
osvdb.org
/89170
vdb-entry
- icinga.org /2013/01/14/icinga-1-6-2-1-7-4-1-8-4-released/
Sources
- CVE List CVE-2012-6096
- NVD CVE-2012-6096
Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.