CVE-2013-1629 json
Improper Input Validation in pip
published 13y ago modified 4mo ago also GHSA-g3p5-fjj9-h8gj , PYSEC-2013-8 , EUVD-2013-0025
- cvss
- 8.4
- version 3.1, GitHub
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- 6.2%
- EPSS 6.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 93%
- public exploits
- 0
- none known
Summary
pip before 1.3 uses HTTP to retrieve packages from the PyPI repository, and does not perform integrity checks on package contents, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted response to a "pip install" operation.
Patch / fix
- pypi pip 1.3
- pypa pip 1.3
- python-pip Debian 14, Debian 13, Debian 12 1.3.1-1
- python-virtualenv Debian 14, Debian 13, Debian 12 1.9.1-1
debian advisories DEBIAN-CVE-2013-1629
- github.com/pypa/pip#791 pull request
Is CVE-2013-1629 in your dependencies? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.
Check with FencerVendor advisories
What the vendors themselves say about their products: affected, fixed or not affected, and what to do.
red hat product security vex CVE-2013-1629 updated cvss 4.4
python-pip: insecure installation mechanism
-
Red Hat All currently supported Red Hat productsnot affected: vulnerable code not present
Red Hat CSAF VEX © Red Hat, Inc., from https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/; changed: reduced to product statuses and remediations. CC BY 4.0 · csaf
Exploit prediction
6.19% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 93% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-09).
Exploits and checks
- reddit.com http://www.reddit.com/r/Python/comments/17rfh7/warning_dont_use_pip_in_an_untrusted_network_a/ referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified
CVSS scores
| assigned by | version | score | vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVD | 2.0 | 6.8 | AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P |
| GitHub | 3.1 | 8.4 | CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H |
Affected packages
| ecosystem | package | affected | fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| pypi | pip | <1.3 |
1.3 |
Classification
- Weakness
-
- CWE-20 Improper Input Validation
References
-
github.com
/pypa/pip/pull/791/files
web, patch, third-party-advisory
-
reddit.com
/r/Python/comments/17rfh7/warning_dont_use_pip_in_an_untrusted_network_a/
exploit, third-party-advisory, web
-
pip-installer.org
/en/latest/installing.html
web, vendor-advisory
-
pip-installer.org
/en/latest/news.html#changelog
web, release-notes, vendor-advisory
-
github.com
/pypa/pip/issues/425
web, third-party-advisory, report
-
bugzilla.redhat.com
/show_bug.cgi?id=968059
web, issue-tracking, third-party-advisory, report
-
nvd.nist.gov
/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-1629
advisory
-
github.com
/advisories/GHSA-g3p5-fjj9-h8gj
advisory
-
github.com
/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/pip/PYSEC-2013-8.yaml
web
-
github.com
/pypa/pip
package
-
reddit.com
/r/Python/comments/17rfh7/warning_dont_use_pip_in_an_untrusted_network_a
web
Sources
- CVE List CVE-2013-1629
- GitHub Advisory GHSA-g3p5-fjj9-h8gj
- NVD CVE-2013-1629
- OSV PYSEC-2013-8
Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.