CVE-2013-1808 json
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in ZeroClipboard.swf and ZeroClipboard10.swf in ZeroClipboard before 1.0.8, as used in em-shorty,…
published 13y ago modified 4mo ago also EUVD-2013-1829
- cvss
- 4.3
- version 2.0, NVD
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- 7.3%
- EPSS 7.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 94%
- public exploits
- 0
- none known
Summary
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in ZeroClipboard.swf and ZeroClipboard10.swf in ZeroClipboard before 1.0.8, as used in em-shorty, RepRapCalculator, Fulcrum, Django, aCMS, and other products, allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the id parameter. NOTE: this is might be the same vulnerability as CVE-2013-1463. If so, it is likely that CVE-2013-1463 will be REJECTed.
Patch / fix
- gd openshift 1.2 2.0.35-11.el6
- js openshift 1.2 1.70-12.el6op
- php openshift 1.2 5.3.3-22.el6
- gdbm openshift 1.2 1.8.0-36.el6
- geos openshift 1.2 3.3.1-1.el6op
- lcms openshift 1.2 1.19-1.el6
- proj openshift 1.2 4.7.0-1.el6op
- uuid openshift 1.2 1.6.1-10.el6
red hat advisories RHEA-2013:1032
Is CVE-2013-1808 in your stack? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.
Check with FencerVendor advisories
What the vendors themselves say about their products: affected, fixed or not affected, and what to do.
red hat product security vex CVE-2013-1808 updated cvss 4.3
stapler-adjunct-zeroclipboard: XSS via copying XSS payload into buffer
-
Red Hat OpenShift Enterprise Node maven3 3.0.3-4, lcms 1.19-1.el6, gd 2.0.35-11.el6, js 1.70-12.el6op, php 5.3.3-22.el6, atlas 3.8.4-2.el6, +137 more Red Hat RHOSE Client 1.2 rubygem-open4 1.3.0-2.el6op Red Hat RHOSE Infrastructure 1.2 js 1.70-12.el6op, ruby193-js 1.8.5-10.el6op, rubygem-bson 1.8.3-1.el6op, rubygem-rack 1.3.0-4.el6op, rubygem-rake 0.8.7-2.1.el6, rubygem-open4 1.3.0-2.el6op, +40 morefixed: vendor fix RHEA-2013:1032
-
Red Hat Subscription Asset Manager Djangonot affected: vulnerable code not present
Red Hat CSAF VEX © Red Hat, Inc., from https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/; changed: reduced to product statuses and remediations. CC BY 4.0 · csaf
Exploit prediction
7.27% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 94% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-09).
Exploits and checks
- securityvulns.ru http://securityvulns.ru/docs29104.html referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified
- openwall.com http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/03/10/2 referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified
- securityfocus.com http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/58257 referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified
CVSS scores
| assigned by | version | score | vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVD | 2.0 | 4.3 | AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N |
Classification
- Weakness
-
- CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation
References
- github.com /jonrohan/ZeroClipboard/commit/a0e02933f5f7ce5f364fbad36a005f0a349f0696
-
securityvulns.ru
/docs29104.html
exploit
-
openwall.com
/lists/oss-security/2013/03/10/2
mailing-list, exploit
-
securityfocus.com
/bid/58257
vdb-entry, exploit
- cloudbees.com /jenkins-advisory/jenkins-security-advisory-2013-05-02.cb
-
openwall.com
/lists/oss-security/2013/03/26/8
mailing-list
-
seclists.org
/fulldisclosure/2013/Feb/103
mailing-list
-
seclists.org
/fulldisclosure/2013/Feb/109
mailing-list
- securityvulns.ru /docs29105.html
-
openwall.com
/lists/oss-security/2013/03/03/3
mailing-list
-
seclists.org
/fulldisclosure/2013/Mar/5
mailing-list
-
seclists.org
/fulldisclosure/2013/Apr/87
mailing-list
- securityvulns.ru /docs29103.html
- github.com /jonrohan/ZeroClipboard/blob/master/docs/releases.md#zeroclipboard-108
-
seclists.org
/fulldisclosure/2013/Apr/88
mailing-list
-
openwall.com
/lists/oss-security/2013/03/25/1
mailing-list
Sources
- CVE List CVE-2013-1808
- NVD CVE-2013-1808
Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.