CVE-2013-3587 json
The HTTPS protocol, as used in unspecified web applications, can encrypt compressed data without properly obfuscating the length of the une…
published 2020-02-21 6 y ago modified 2026-06-16 4 mo ago also EUVD-2013-3521
- cvss
- 5.9
- version 3.1, NVD
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- 6.0%
- EPSS 6.0% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 93%
- public exploits
- 0
- none known
Summary
The HTTPS protocol, as used in unspecified web applications, can encrypt compressed data without properly obfuscating the length of the unencrypted data, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to obtain plaintext secret values by observing length differences during a series of guesses in which a string in an HTTP request URL potentially matches an unknown string in an HTTP response body, aka a "BREACH" attack, a different issue than CVE-2012-4929.
Vendor advisories
What the vendors themselves say about their products: affected, fixed or not affected, and what to do.
red hat product security vex CVE-2013-3587 updated cvss 4.3
BREACH attack against HTTP compression
-
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 httpd Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 httpd, mod_ssl, httpd-tools, httpd-manualaffected: no fix planned “Will not fix”
Red Hat CSAF VEX © Red Hat, Inc., from https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/; changed: reduced to product statuses and remediations. CC BY 4.0 · csaf
Exploit prediction
6.05% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 93% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-09).
Exploits and checks
- security.stackexchange.com http://security.stackexchange.com/questions/20406/is-http-compression-safe#20407 referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified
- hackerone.com https://hackerone.com/reports/254895 referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified
CVSS scores
| assigned by | version | score | vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVD | 3.1 | 5.9 | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N |
| NVD | 2.0 | 4.3 | AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N |
Affected products
- n/a HTTPS protocol
Classification
- Weakness
-
- CWE-200 Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
References
-
security.stackexchange.com
/questions/20406/is-http-compression-safe#20407
exploit, third-party-advisory
-
hackerone.com
/reports/254895
exploit, third-party-advisory
-
breachattack.com
/
third-party-advisory
-
slashdot.org
/story/13/08/05/233216
third-party-advisory
-
iacr.org
/cryptodb/archive/2002/FSE/3091/3091.pdf
third-party-advisory
-
blackhat.com
/us-13/briefings.html#Prado
third-party-advisory
-
github.com
/meldium/breach-mitigation-rails
third-party-advisory
-
djangoproject.com
/weblog/2013/aug/06/breach-and-django/
third-party-advisory
-
kb.cert.org
/vuls/id/987798
third-party-advisory, us-government-resource
-
bugzilla.redhat.com
/show_bug.cgi?id=995168
issue-tracking, third-party-advisory
-
support.f5.com
/csp/article/K14634
third-party-advisory
-
lists.apache.org
/thread.html/r7f0e9cfd166934172d43ca4c272b8bdda4a343036229d9937affd1e1%40%3Cdev.httpd.apache.org%3E
mailing-list
Sources
- CVE List CVE-2013-3587
- NVD CVE-2013-3587
Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.