CVE-2013-3690 json
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in cgi-bin/users.cgi in Brickcom FB-100Ap, WCB-100Ap, MD-100Ap, WFB-100Ap, OB-100Ae, OSD-04…
published 13y ago modified 4mo ago also EUVD-2013-3623
- cvss
- 6.8
- version 2.0, NVD
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- 12.4%
- EPSS 12.4% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 96%
- public exploits
- 1
- Exploit-DB
Summary
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in cgi-bin/users.cgi in Brickcom FB-100Ap, WCB-100Ap, MD-100Ap, WFB-100Ap, OB-100Ae, OSD-040E, and possibly other camera models with firmware 3.1.0.8 and earlier, allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that add users.
Is CVE-2013-3690 in your stack? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.
Check with FencerTimeline
- First public exploit (EDB-38582)
- Published
Exploit prediction
12.38% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 96% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-09).
Exploits and checks
- EDB-38582 Brickcom Multiple IP Cameras - Cross-Site Request Forgery remote, 2013-06-12
CVSS scores
| assigned by | version | score | vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVD | 2.0 | 6.8 | AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P |
Classification
- Weakness
-
- CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery
References
-
seclists.org
/fulldisclosure/2013/Jun/84
mailing-list
Sources
- CVE List CVE-2013-3690
- NVD CVE-2013-3690
Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.