Skip to content
Fencer Intel
high 7.5

CVE-2013-7110 json

Transifex command-line client has improper certificate validation

published 2014-05-02 12 y ago modified 2026-06-17 4 mo ago also GHSA-jf99-2rj4-jxrm , PYSEC-2014-72 , EUVD-2014-0104

cvss
7.5
version 3.1, GitHub
cisa kev
Not listed
not in CISA's catalog
epss
0.8%
EPSS 0.8% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 57%
public exploits
0
none known

Summary

Transifex command-line client before 0.10 does not validate X.509 certificates for data transfer connections, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof a Transifex server via an arbitrary certificate. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2013-2073.

Patch / fix

  • pypi transifex-client 0.10, 0.11.0
  • transifex-client Debian 11 0.10-1

debian advisories DEBIAN-CVE-2013-7110

Vendor advisories

What the vendors themselves say about their products: affected, fixed or not affected, and what to do.

red hat product security vex CVE-2013-7110 updated cvss 4.3

transifex-client: incomplete fix for CVE-2013-2073

  • Red Hat All currently supported Red Hat products
    not affected: vulnerable code not present

Red Hat CSAF VEX © Red Hat, Inc., from https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/; changed: reduced to product statuses and remediations. CC BY 4.0 · csaf

Exploit prediction

0.83% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 57% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-09).

CVSS scores

assigned by version score vector
NVD 2.0 4.3 AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
GitHub 3.1 7.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Affected packages

ecosystem package affected fixed in
pypi transifex-client
<0.10
<0.11.0
0.10
0.11.0

Classification

Weakness
  • CWE-20 Improper Input Validation

References

Sources

Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.