CVE-2014-0172 json
Integer overflow in the check_section function in dwarf_begin_elf.c in the libdw library, as used in elfutils 0.153 and possibly through 0.…
published 12y ago modified 4mo ago also EUVD-2014-0225
- cvss
- 6.8
- version 2.0, NVD
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- 4.0%
- EPSS 4.0% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 90%
- public exploits
- 0
- none known
Summary
Integer overflow in the check_section function in dwarf_begin_elf.c in the libdw library, as used in elfutils 0.153 and possibly through 0.158 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a malformed compressed debug section in an ELF file, which triggers a heap-based buffer overflow.
Patch / fix
- elfutils Debian 14, Debian 13, Debian 12 0.158-1
debian advisories DEBIAN-CVE-2014-0172
- elfutils Ubuntu 14.04 LTS 0.158-0ubuntu5.1
ubuntu advisories UBUNTU-CVE-2014-0172
Ubuntu security data © Canonical Ltd., from https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-security-notices via OSV; changed: normalised to fixed package versions per release. CC BY-SA 4.0
- elfutils RHEL 7 0.160-1.el7
- elfutils-libs RHEL 7 0.160-1.el7
- elfutils-libelf RHEL 7 0.160-1.el7
red hat advisories RHEA-2015:0369
- elfutils openSUSE Tumbleweed 0.167-1.5
opensuse advisories openSUSE-SU-2024:10570-1
Is CVE-2014-0172 in your stack? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.
Check with FencerVendor advisories
What the vendors themselves say about their products: affected, fixed or not affected, and what to do.
red hat product security vex CVE-2014-0172 updated cvss 4.4
elfutils: integer overflow, leading to a heap-based buffer overflow in libdw
-
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Client (v. 7) elfutils 0.160-1.el7, elfutils-libs 0.160-1.el7, elfutils-libelf 0.160-1.el7 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Client Optional (v. 7) elfutils-devel 0.160-1.el7, elfutils-debuginfo 0.160-1.el7, elfutils-devel-static 0.160-1.el7, elfutils-libelf-devel 0.160-1.el7, elfutils-libelf-devel-static 0.160-1.el7 Red Hat Enterprise Linux ComputeNode (v. 7) elfutils 0.160-1.el7, elfutils-libs 0.160-1.el7, elfutils-libelf 0.160-1.el7 Red Hat Enterprise Linux ComputeNode Optional (v. 7) elfutils-devel 0.160-1.el7, elfutils-debuginfo 0.160-1.el7, elfutils-devel-static 0.160-1.el7, elfutils-libelf-devel 0.160-1.el7, elfutils-libelf-devel-static 0.160-1.el7 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7) elfutils 0.160-1.el7, elfutils-libs 0.160-1.el7, elfutils-libelf 0.160-1.el7 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 7) elfutils-debuginfo 0.160-1.el7, elfutils-devel-static 0.160-1.el7, elfutils-libelf-devel-static 0.160-1.el7fixed: vendor fix RHEA-2015:0369
+2 more productsfewer
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation (v. 7) elfutils 0.160-1.el7, elfutils-libs 0.160-1.el7, elfutils-libelf 0.160-1.el7 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation Optional (v. 7) elfutils-debuginfo 0.160-1.el7, elfutils-devel-static 0.160-1.el7, elfutils-libelf-devel-static 0.160-1.el7 -
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 elfutils Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 elfutils, elfutils-libs, elfutils-libelfnot affected: vulnerable code not present
Red Hat CSAF VEX © Red Hat, Inc., from https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/; changed: reduced to product statuses and remediations. CC BY 4.0 · csaf
Exploit prediction
4.03% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 90% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-09).
CVSS scores
| assigned by | version | score | vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVD | 2.0 | 6.8 | AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P |
Classification
- Weakness
-
- CWE-189 Numeric Errors
References
-
lists.fedorahosted.org
/pipermail/elfutils-devel/2014-April/003921.html
mailing-list, patch
-
security.gentoo.org
/glsa/201612-32
vendor-advisory
-
ubuntu.com
/usn/USN-2188-1
vendor-advisory
-
seclists.org
/oss-sec/2014/q2/54
mailing-list
-
securityfocus.com
/bid/66714
vdb-entry
- bugzilla.redhat.com /show_bug.cgi?id=1085663
Sources
- CVE List CVE-2014-0172
- NVD CVE-2014-0172
Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.