Skip to content
Fencer Intel
medium 5.3

CVE-2014-0483 json

Django data leakage via querystring manipulation in admin

published 12y ago modified 4mo ago also GHSA-rw75-m7gp-92m3 , PYSEC-2014-7 , EUVD-2014-0015

cvss
5.3
version 3.1, GitHub
cisa kev
Not listed
not in CISA's catalog
epss
2.0%
EPSS 2.0% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 80%
public exploits
0
none known

Summary

The administrative interface (contrib.admin) in Django before 1.4.14, 1.5.x before 1.5.9, 1.6.x before 1.6.6, and 1.7 before release candidate 3 does not check if a field represents a relationship between models, which allows remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive information via a to_field parameter in a popup action to an admin change form page, as demonstrated by a /admin/auth/user/?pop=1&t=password URI.

Patch / fix

  • pypi django 1.4.14, 1.5.9, 1.6.6, 1.7c3
  • python-django Debian 14, Debian 13, Debian 12 1.6.6-1

debian advisories DEBIAN-CVE-2014-0483

  • python-django Ubuntu 14.04 LTS 1.6.1-2ubuntu0.4

ubuntu advisories UBUNTU-CVE-2014-0483

Ubuntu security data © Canonical Ltd., from https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-security-notices via OSV; changed: normalised to fixed package versions per release. CC BY-SA 4.0

Is CVE-2014-0483 in your dependencies? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.

Check with Fencer

Vendor advisories

What the vendors themselves say about their products: affected, fixed or not affected, and what to do.

red hat product security vex CVE-2014-0483 updated cvss 3.5

Django: data leakage via querystring manipulation in admin

  • Red Hat Enterprise Linux OpenStack Platform 5 (Icehouse) python-django Red Hat OpenStack Platform 4 Django14
    affected: no fix available
  • Red Hat Subscription Asset Manager Django
    affected: no fix planned “Will not fix”

Red Hat CSAF VEX © Red Hat, Inc., from https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/; changed: reduced to product statuses and remediations. CC BY 4.0 · csaf

Exploit prediction

1.98% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 80% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-09).

Exploits and checks

  • github.com https://github.com/django/django/commit/2b31342cdf14fc20e07c43d258f1e7334ad664a6 referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified

CVSS scores

assigned by version score vector
NVD 2.0 3.5 AV:N/AC:M/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
GitHub 3.1 5.3 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Affected packages

ecosystem package affected fixed in
pypi django
<1.4.14
>=1.5, <1.5.9
>=1.6, <1.6.6
>=1.7a1, <1.7c3
1.4.14
1.5.9
1.6.6
1.7c3

Classification

Weakness
  • CWE-264 Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls
  • CWE-200 Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
Technology feeds

References

Sources

Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.