CVE-2014-2734 json
The openssl extension in Ruby 2.x does not properly maintain the state of process memory after a file is reopened, which allows remote atta…
published 2014-04-24 12 y ago modified 2026-06-17 4 mo ago also EUVD-2014-2762
- cvss
- 5.8
- version 2.0, NVD
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- 5.3%
- EPSS 5.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 92%
- public exploits
- 0
- none known
Summary
The openssl extension in Ruby 2.x does not properly maintain the state of process memory after a file is reopened, which allows remote attackers to spoof signatures within the context of a Ruby script that attempts signature verification after performing a certain sequence of filesystem operations. NOTE: this issue has been disputed by the Ruby OpenSSL team and third parties, who state that the original demonstration PoC contains errors and redundant or unnecessarily-complex code that does not appear to be related to a demonstration of the issue. As of 20140502, CVE is not aware of any public comment by the original researcher
Vendor advisories
What the vendors themselves say about their products: affected, fixed or not affected, and what to do.
red hat product security vex CVE-2014-2734 updated cvss 2.6
ruby: SSL signature spoofing flaw
-
Red Hat OpenShift Enterprise 1 ruby193-ruby Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 ruby Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 ruby, ruby-ri, ruby-irb, ruby-libs, ruby-rdoc, ruby-tcltk Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 ruby, ruby-irb, rubygems, ruby-libs, ruby-tcltk, rubygem-json, +6 more Red Hat JBoss SOA Platform 4 jruby jruby Red Hat JBoss SOA Platform 5 jruby jrubynot affected: vulnerable code not present
+3 more productsfewer
Red Hat OpenStack Platform 3 ruby193-ruby Red Hat Software Collections ruby193-ruby, ruby200-ruby, ruby193-ruby-irb, ruby193-rubygems, ruby200-ruby-irb, ruby200-rubygems, +17 more Red Hat Subscription Asset Manager ruby193-ruby
Red Hat CSAF VEX © Red Hat, Inc., from https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/; changed: reduced to product statuses and remediations. CC BY 4.0 · csaf
Exploit prediction
5.35% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 92% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-09).
Exploits and checks
- packetstormsecurity.com http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/126218/Ruby-OpenSSL-Private-Key-Spoofing.html referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified
- seclists.org http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2014/Apr/231 referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified
CVSS scores
| assigned by | version | score | vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVD | 2.0 | 5.8 | AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N |
Classification
- Weakness
-
- CWE-399 Resource Management Errors
References
-
packetstormsecurity.com
/files/126218/Ruby-OpenSSL-Private-Key-Spoofing.html
exploit
-
seclists.org
/fulldisclosure/2014/Apr/231
mailing-list, exploit
-
osvdb.org
/106006
vdb-entry
- news.ycombinator.com /item?id=7601973
-
securityfocus.com
/bid/66956
vdb-entry
-
seclists.org
/fulldisclosure/2014/May/13
mailing-list
- gist.github.com /10446549
- ruby-lang.org /en/news/2014/05/09/dispute-of-vulnerability-cve-2014-2734/
- gist.github.com /emboss/91696b56cd227c8a0c13
- github.com /adrienthebo/cve-2014-2734/
Sources
- CVE List CVE-2014-2734
- NVD CVE-2014-2734
Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.