CVE-2014-3849 json
The iMember360 plugin 3.8.012 through 3.9.001 for WordPress does not properly restrict access, which allows remote attackers to delete arbi…
published 12y ago modified 4mo ago also EUVD-2014-3786
- cvss
- 4.3
- version 2.0, NVD
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- 6.0%
- EPSS 6.0% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 93%
- public exploits
- 1
- Exploit-DB
Summary
The iMember360 plugin 3.8.012 through 3.9.001 for WordPress does not properly restrict access, which allows remote attackers to delete arbitrary users via a request containing a user name in the Email parameter and the API key in the i4w_clearuser parameter.
Is CVE-2014-3849 in your stack? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.
Check with FencerTimeline
- First public exploit (EDB-33076)
- Published
Exploit prediction
5.97% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 93% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-09).
Exploits and checks
- EDB-33076 WordPress Plugin iMember360 3.8.012 < 3.9.001 - Multiple Vulnerabilities webapps, 2014-04-28
- packetstormsecurity.com http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/126324/WordPress-iMember360is-3.9.001-XSS-Disclosure-Code-Execution.html referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified
- seclists.org http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2014/Apr/265 referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified
CVSS scores
| assigned by | version | score | vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVD | 2.0 | 4.3 | AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P |
Classification
- Weakness
-
- CWE-264 Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls
- Technology feeds
References
-
exploit-db.com
/exploits/33076
exploit
-
packetstormsecurity.com
/files/126324/WordPress-iMember360is-3.9.001-XSS-Disclosure-Code-Execution.html
exploit
-
seclists.org
/fulldisclosure/2014/Apr/265
mailing-list, exploit
-
osvdb.org
/106300
vdb-entry
Sources
- CVE List CVE-2014-3849
- NVD CVE-2014-3849
Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.