Skip to content
Fencer Intel
medium 6.1

CVE-2014-3995 json

Djblets Cross-site scripting Vulnerability

published 12y ago modified 4mo ago also GHSA-4xf6-xr96-7vmp , PYSEC-2014-79 , EUVD-2014-0017

cvss
6.1
version 3.1, GitHub
cisa kev
Not listed
not in CISA's catalog
epss
2.1%
EPSS 2.1% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 81%
public exploits
0
none known

Summary

Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in gravatars/templatetags/gravatars.py in Djblets before 0.7.30 and 0.8.x before 0.8.3 for Django allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a user display name.

Patch / fix

  • pypi djblets 0.7.30, 0.8.3

Is CVE-2014-3995 in your dependencies? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.

Check with Fencer

Vendor advisories

What the vendors themselves say about their products: affected, fixed or not affected, and what to do.

red hat product security vex CVE-2014-3995 updated cvss 4.3

python-djblets: XSS Vulnerability in Djblets gravatar templates

  • Red Hat All currently supported Red Hat products
    not affected: vulnerable code not present

Red Hat CSAF VEX © Red Hat, Inc., from https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/; changed: reduced to product statuses and remediations. CC BY 4.0 · csaf

Exploit prediction

2.09% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 81% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-09).

Exploits and checks

  • github.com https://github.com/djblets/djblets/commit/77ac64642ad530bf69e390c51fc6fdcb8914c8e7 referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified

CVSS scores

assigned by version score vector
NVD 2.0 4.3 AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
GitHub 3.1 6.1 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Affected packages

ecosystem package affected fixed in
pypi djblets
<0.7.30
>=0.8, <0.8.3
0.7.30
0.8.3

Classification

Weakness
  • CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation

References

Sources

Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.