Skip to content
Fencer Intel
medium 6.8

CVE-2014-7836 json

Moodle multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities

published 11y ago modified 4mo ago also GHSA-wpq5-q3mj-8f3r , EUVD-2022-5616

cvss
6.8
version 2.0, NVD
cisa kev
Not listed
not in CISA's catalog
epss
1.0%
EPSS 1.0% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 63%
public exploits
0
none known

Summary

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the LTI module in Moodle through 2.4.11, 2.5.x before 2.5.9, 2.6.x before 2.6.6, and 2.7.x before 2.7.3 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for a (1) mod/lti/request_tool.php or (2) mod/lti/instructor_edit_tool_type.php request.

Patch / fix

  • packagist moodle/moodle 2.5.9, 2.6.6, 2.7.3

Is CVE-2014-7836 in your dependencies? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.

Check with Fencer

Vendor advisories

What the vendors themselves say about their products: affected, fixed or not affected, and what to do.

red hat product security vex CVE-2014-7836 updated cvss 4.3

moodle: security issues fixed in versions 2.7.3, 2.6.6 and 2.5.9

  • Red Hat All currently supported Red Hat products
    not affected: vulnerable code not present

Red Hat CSAF VEX © Red Hat, Inc., from https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/; changed: reduced to product statuses and remediations. CC BY 4.0 · csaf

Exploit prediction

1.01% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 63% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-09).

CVSS scores

assigned by version score vector
NVD 2.0 6.8 AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

Affected packages

ecosystem package affected fixed in
packagist moodle/moodle
<2.5.9
>=2.6.0, <2.6.6
>=2.7.0, <2.7.3
2.5.9
2.6.6
2.7.3

Classification

Weakness
  • CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery

References

Sources

Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.