Skip to content
Fencer Intel
medium 6.8

CVE-2014-9392 json

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the PictoBrowser (pictobrowser-gallery) plugin 0.3.1 and earlier for WordPress allows re…

published 11y ago modified 4mo ago also EUVD-2014-9213

cvss
6.8
version 2.0, NVD
cisa kev
Not listed
not in CISA's catalog
epss
1.0%
EPSS 1.0% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 63%
public exploits
0
none known

Summary

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the PictoBrowser (pictobrowser-gallery) plugin 0.3.1 and earlier for WordPress allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via the pictoBrowserFlickrUser parameter in the options-page.php page to wp-admin/options-general.php.

Is CVE-2014-9392 in your stack? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.

Check with Fencer

Exploit prediction

1.00% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 63% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-09).

Exploits and checks

  • packetstormsecurity.com http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/129638/WordPress-PictoBrowser-0.3.1-CSRF-XSS.html referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified

CVSS scores

assigned by version score vector
NVD 2.0 6.8 AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

Classification

Weakness
  • CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery
Technology feeds

References

Sources

Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.