Skip to content
Fencer Intel
medium 6.8

CVE-2015-1874 json

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Contact Form DB (aka CFDB and contact-form-7-to-database-extension) plugin before 2.…

published 11y ago modified 4mo ago also EUVD-2015-1980

cvss
6.8
version 2.0, NVD
cisa kev
Not listed
not in CISA's catalog
epss
1.5%
EPSS 1.5% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 73%
public exploits
0
none known

Summary

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Contact Form DB (aka CFDB and contact-form-7-to-database-extension) plugin before 2.8.32 for WordPress allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that delete all plugin records via a request in the CF7DBPluginSubmissions page to wp-admin/admin.php.

Patch / fix

Is CVE-2015-1874 in your stack? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.

Check with Fencer

Exploit prediction

1.47% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 73% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-09).

Exploits and checks

  • packetstormsecurity.com http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/130654/WordPress-Contact-Form-DB-2.8.29-Cross-Site-Request-Forgery.html referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified
  • seclists.org http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2015/Mar/21 referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified
  • security.dxw.com https://security.dxw.com/advisories/csrf-in-contact-form-db-allows-attacker-to-delete-all-stored-form-submissions/ referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified

CVSS scores

assigned by version score vector
NVD 2.0 6.8 AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

Classification

Weakness
  • CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery
Technology feeds

References

Sources

Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.