The ASUS Vivobaby application before 1.1.09 for Android has Missing SSL Certificate Validation.

published 2019-06-20 7 y ago modified 2026-06-17 4 mo ago also EUVD-2017-9087

cvss: 9.1; version 3.0, NVD
cisa kev: Not listed; not in CISA's catalog
epss: 0.9%; EPSS 0.9% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 60%
public exploits: 0; none known

Patch / fix

fixed in 2

asus hivivo 5.6.27
asus vivobaby 1.1.09

Exploit prediction

0.92% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 60% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-09).

Exploits and checks

firstsight.me http://firstsight.me/2017/12/lack-of-binary-protection-at-asus-vivo-baby-and-hivivo-for-android-that-could-result-of-several-security-issues referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified

CVSS scores

assigned by	version	score	vector
NVD	3.0	9.1	CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
NVD	2.0	6.4	AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N

Classification

Weakness

CWE-295 Improper Certificate Validation

References

firstsight.me /2017/12/lack-of-binary-protection-at-asus-vivo-baby-and-hivivo-for-android-that-could-result-of-several-secur
exploit, third-party-advisory

Sources

CVE List CVE-2017-17944
NVD CVE-2017-17944

Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.

Summary