CVE-2018-12608 json
Docker Authentication Bypass
published 8y ago modified last mo. also GHSA-qrqr-3x5j-2xw9 , EUVD-2024-0408
- cvss
- 7.5
- version 3.0, NVD
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- 0.9%
- EPSS 0.9% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 60%
- public exploits
- 0
- none known
Summary
An issue was discovered in Docker Moby before 17.06.0. The Docker engine validated a client TLS certificate using both the configured client CA root certificate and all system roots on non-Windows systems. This allowed a client with any domain validated certificate signed by a system-trusted root CA (as opposed to one signed by the configured CA root certificate) to authenticate.
Patch / fix
- go github.com/docker/docker 17.06.0-ce
- mobyproject moby 17.06.0
- docker.io Debian 14, Debian 13, Debian 12 18.03.1+dfsg1-2
debian advisories DEBIAN-CVE-2018-12608
- docker.io Ubuntu 16.04 LTS 18.06.1-0ubuntu1~16.04.2
- docker.io Ubuntu 18.04 LTS 18.06.1-0ubuntu1~18.04.1
ubuntu advisories UBUNTU-CVE-2018-12608
Ubuntu security data © Canonical Ltd., from https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-security-notices via OSV; changed: normalised to fixed package versions per release. CC BY-SA 4.0
- github.com/moby/moby@190c6e8 commit
- github.com/moby/moby#33182 pull request
Is CVE-2018-12608 in your dependencies? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.
Check with FencerVendor advisories
What the vendors themselves say about their products: affected, fixed or not affected, and what to do.
red hat product security vex CVE-2018-12608 updated cvss 7.5
moby: cert signing bypass
-
Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 2 openshift-service-mesh/proxyv2-rhel8affected: workaround, no fix planned “Some environments may be able to mitigate this issue by removing extra CAs from the host.”
-
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4 openshift4/ose-console, openshift4/ose-agent-installer-api-server-rhel9affected: workaround, no fix available, no fix planned “Some environments may be able to mitigate this issue by removing extra CAs from the host.”
-
Red Hat RHOSSM 2.6 for RHEL 8 openshift-service-mesh/kiali-rhel8 1.73.9-2, openshift-service-mesh/pilot-rhel8 2.6.0-19, openshift-service-mesh/grafana-rhel8 2.6.0-7, openshift-service-mesh/ratelimit-rhel8 2.6.0-8, openshift-service-mesh/istio-cni-rhel8 2.6.0-21, openshift-service-mesh/kiali-ossmc-rhel8 1.73.10-3, +3 more Red Hat RHOSSM 2.6 for RHEL 9 openshift-service-mesh/proxyv2-rhel9 2.6.0-18fixed: vendor fix “Some environments may be able to mitigate this issue by removing extra CAs from the host.” RHSA-2024:5094
-
Red Hat Multicluster Engine for Kubernetes multicluster-engine/agent-service-rhel8 Red Hat Ceph Storage 5 rhceph/rhceph-5-dashboard-rhel8 Red Hat Ceph Storage 6 rhceph/rhceph-6-dashboard-rhel9 Red Hat Ceph Storage 7 rhceph/grafana-rhel9not affected: vulnerable code not present
Red Hat CSAF VEX © Red Hat, Inc., from https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/; changed: reduced to product statuses and remediations. CC BY 4.0 · csaf
Exploit prediction
0.92% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 60% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-09).
CVSS scores
| assigned by | version | score | vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVD | 3.0 | 7.5 | CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N |
| NVD | 2.0 | 5.0 | AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N |
| GitHub | 3.0 | 7.5 | CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N |
Affected packages
| ecosystem | package | affected | fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| go | github.com/docker/docker | <17.06.0-ce |
17.06.0-ce |
Classification
- Weakness
- Technology feeds
References
-
github.com
/moby/moby/pull/33182
web, patch, third-party-advisory
-
github.com
/moby/moby/commit/190c6e8cf8b893874a33d83f78307f1bed0bfbcd
web
-
nvd.nist.gov
/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-12608
advisory
-
github.com
/moby/moby/issues/33173
web
-
github.com
/moby/moby
package
Sources
- CVE List CVE-2018-12608
- GitHub Advisory GHSA-qrqr-3x5j-2xw9
- NVD CVE-2018-12608
Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.