CVE-2019-11409 in the critical feed json
app/operator_panel/exec.php in the Operator Panel module in FusionPBX 4.4.3 suffers from a command injection vulnerability due to a lack of…
published 7y ago modified 4mo ago also EUVD-2019-3084
- cvss
- 8.8
- version 3.1, NVD
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- 87.5%
- EPSS 87.5% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 99.7%
- public exploits
- 2
- Metasploit and Exploit-DB
Summary
app/operator_panel/exec.php in the Operator Panel module in FusionPBX 4.4.3 suffers from a command injection vulnerability due to a lack of input validation that allows authenticated non-administrative attackers to execute commands on the host. This can further lead to remote code execution when combined with an XSS vulnerability also present in the FusionPBX Operator Panel module.
Patch / fix
Is CVE-2019-11409 in your stack? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.
Check with FencerTimeline
- First public exploit (Metasploit exploit/unix/webapp/fusionpbx_operator_panel_exec_cmd_exec)
- Published
Exploit prediction
87.48% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 99.7% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-09).
Exploits and checks
- Metasploit exploit/unix/webapp/fusionpbx_operator_panel_exec_cmd_exec FusionPBX Operator Panel exec.php Command Execution metasploit exploit, excellent rank, 2019-06-06
- EDB-47697 FusionPBX - Operator Panel exec.php Command Execution (Metasploit) remote, 2019-11-20
- packetstormsecurity.com http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/153256/FusionPBX-4.4.3-Remote-Command-Execution.html referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified
- blog.gdssecurity.com https://blog.gdssecurity.com/labs/2019/6/7/rce-using-caller-id-multiple-vulnerabilities-in-fusionpbx.html referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified
- packetstormsecurity.com http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/155344/FusionPBX-Operator-Panel-exec.php-Command-Execution.html referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified
CVSS scores
| assigned by | version | score | vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVD | 3.1 | 8.8 | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H |
| NVD | 2.0 | 6.5 | AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P |
Classification
- Weakness
-
- CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command
References
-
github.com
/fusionpbx/fusionpbx/commit/e43ca27ba2d9c0109a6bf198fe2f8d79f63e0611
patch, third-party-advisory
-
packetstormsecurity.com
/files/153256/FusionPBX-4.4.3-Remote-Command-Execution.html
exploit, third-party-advisory, vdb-entry
-
blog.gdssecurity.com
/labs/2019/6/7/rce-using-caller-id-multiple-vulnerabilities-in-fusionpbx.html
exploit, third-party-advisory
-
packetstormsecurity.com
/files/155344/FusionPBX-Operator-Panel-exec.php-Command-Execution.html
exploit, third-party-advisory, vdb-entry
Sources
- CVE List CVE-2019-11409
- NVD CVE-2019-11409
Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.