Server-side request forgery in the backup & restore functionality of ProSyst mBS SDK and Bosch IoT Gateway Software

published 2019-08-21 7y ago modified 2026-06-17 4mo ago also EUVD-2019-3555

cvss: 8.6; version 3.0, CNA
cisa kev: Not listed; not in CISA's catalog
epss: 1.8%; EPSS 1.8% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 78%
public exploits: 0; none known

A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the backup & restore functionality in earlier versions than ProSyst mBS SDK 8.2.6 and Bosch IoT Gateway Software 9.3.0 allows a remote attacker to forge GET requests to arbitrary URLs. In addition, this could potentially allow an attacker to read sensitive zip files from the local server.

Patch / fix

fixed in 2

Bosch IoT Gateway Software 9.3.0
ProSyst mBS SDK 8.2.6

Is CVE-2019-11897 in your stack? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.

Check with Fencer

Exploit prediction

1.78% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 78% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-09).

CVSS scores

assigned by	version	score	vector
CNA	3.0	8.6	CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
NVD	3.0	8.6	CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
NVD	2.0	5.0	AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N

Affected products

Bosch IoT Gateway Software
ProSyst mBS SDK

Classification

Weakness

CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery

References

psirt.bosch.com /Advisory/BOSCH-SA-562575.html
vendor-advisory

Sources

CVE List CVE-2019-11897
NVD CVE-2019-11897

Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.