CVE-2019-13170 json
Some Xerox printers (such as the Phaser 3320 V53.006.16.000) did not implement any mechanism to avoid CSRF attacks.
published 6y ago modified 4mo ago also EUVD-2019-4697
- cvss
- 6.5
- version 3.1, NVD
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- 0.4%
- EPSS 0.4% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 35%
- public exploits
- 0
- none known
Summary
Some Xerox printers (such as the Phaser 3320 V53.006.16.000) did not implement any mechanism to avoid CSRF attacks. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability can lead to the takeover of a local account on the device.
Is CVE-2019-13170 in your stack? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.
Check with FencerExploit prediction
0.41% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 35% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-09).
CVSS scores
| assigned by | version | score | vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVD | 3.1 | 6.5 | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N |
| NVD | 2.0 | 4.3 | AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N |
Classification
- Weakness
-
- CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery
References
-
security.business.xerox.com
/
vendor-advisory
-
nccgroup.trust
/us/our-research/technical-advisory-multiple-vulnerabilities-in-xerox-printers/
third-party-advisory
Sources
- CVE List CVE-2019-13170
- NVD CVE-2019-13170
Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.