Skip to content
Fencer Intel
high 7.2

CVE-2019-7617 json

Elastic APM agent for Python client CGI proxy redirection flaw

published 7y ago modified 4mo ago also GHSA-22jh-6gx8-f944 , PYSEC-2019-178 , EUVD-2019-0048

cvss
7.2
version 3.0, NVD
cisa kev
Not listed
not in CISA's catalog
epss
1.6%
EPSS 1.6% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 75%
public exploits
0
none known

Summary

When the Elastic APM agent for Python versions before 5.1.0 is run as a CGI script, there is a variable name clash flaw if a remote attacker can control the proxy header. This could result in an attacker redirecting collected APM data to a proxy of their choosing.

Patch / fix

  • pypi elastic-apm 5.1.0
  • elastic apm_agent 5.1.0

Is CVE-2019-7617 in your dependencies? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.

Check with Fencer

Exploit prediction

1.55% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 75% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-09).

CVSS scores

assigned by version score vector
NVD 3.0 7.2 CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
NVD 2.0 6.4 AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N
GitHub 3.0 7.2 CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Affected packages

ecosystem package affected fixed in
pypi elastic-apm
<5.1.0
5.1.0

Affected products

  • Elastic Elastic APM agent for Python

Classification

Weakness
  • CWE-20 Improper Input Validation

References

Sources

Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.