Incorrect Access Control issue in Yellowfin Business Intelligence 7.3 allows remote attackers to escalate privilege via MIAdminStyles.i4 Ad…

published 2022-09-14 4y ago modified 2026-06-17 4mo ago also EUVD-2020-11490

cvss: 9.0; version 3.1, NVD
cisa kev: Not listed; not in CISA's catalog
epss: 1.6%; EPSS 1.6% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 75%
public exploits: 0; none known

Incorrect Access Control issue in Yellowfin Business Intelligence 7.3 allows remote attackers to escalate privilege via MIAdminStyles.i4 Admin UI.

Is CVE-2020-19586 in your stack? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.

Check with Fencer

Exploit prediction

1.56% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 75% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-09).

Exploits and checks

github.com https://github.com/Deepak983/CVE-2020-19586/blob/main/Stored%20XSS%20in%20MIAdminStyles.i4%20through%20privileges%20escalation.pdf referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified

CVSS scores

assigned by	version	score	vector
NVD	3.1	9.0	CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Classification

Weakness

CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation

References

github.com /Deepak983/CVE-2020-19586/blob/main/Stored%20XSS%20in%20MIAdminStyles.i4%20through%20privileges%20escalation.p
exploit, third-party-advisory

Sources

CVE List CVE-2020-19586
NVD CVE-2020-19586

Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.