Expedition Migration Tool: Insufficient Cross Site Request Forgery protection.

published 2020-02-12 6y ago modified 2026-06-17 4mo ago also EUVD-2020-12767

cvss: 7.5; version 3.1, CNA
cisa kev: Not listed; not in CISA's catalog
epss: 0.5%; EPSS 0.5% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 43%
public exploits: 0; none known

Insufficient Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) protection on Expedition Migration Tool allows remote unauthenticated attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators and to perform actions on the Expedition Migration Tool. This issue affects Expedition Migration Tool 1.1.51 and earlier versions.

Patch / fix

fixed in 1

Palo Alto Networks Expedition 1.1.52

Is CVE-2020-1977 in your stack? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.

Check with Fencer

Exploit prediction

0.51% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 43% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-09).

CVSS scores

assigned by	version	score	vector
CNA	3.1	7.5	CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
NVD	3.1	8.8	CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
NVD	2.0	6.8	AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

Affected products

Palo Alto Networks Expedition

Classification

Weakness

CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery

References

security.paloaltonetworks.com /CVE-2020-1977
vendor-advisory
tenable.com /security/research/tra-2020-11
third-party-advisory

Sources

CVE List CVE-2020-1977
NVD CVE-2020-1977

Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.