Skip to content
Fencer Intel
high 8.0

CVE-2020-2196 json

Complete lack of CSRF protection in Jenkins Selenium Plugin can lead to OS command injection

published 6y ago modified 4mo ago also GHSA-rp4x-xpgf-4xv7 , EUVD-2022-5205

cvss
8.0
version 3.1, NVD
cisa kev
Not listed
not in CISA's catalog
epss
0.9%
EPSS 0.9% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 61%
public exploits
0
none known

Summary

Jenkins Selenium Plugin 3.141.59 and earlier has no CSRF protection for its HTTP endpoints, allowing attackers to perform all administrative actions provided by the plugin.

Is CVE-2020-2196 in your dependencies? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.

Check with Fencer

Exploit prediction

0.94% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 61% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-09).

CVSS scores

assigned by version score vector
NVD 3.1 8.0 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
NVD 2.0 6.0 AV:N/AC:M/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
GitHub 3.1 7.1 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Affected packages

ecosystem package affected fixed in
maven org.jenkins-ci.plugins:selenium
<=3.141.59
no fix listed

Affected products

  • Jenkins project Jenkins Selenium Plugin

Classification

Weakness
  • CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery

References

Sources

Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.