The SAS portal of Mitel MiCollab before 9.2 could allow an attacker to access user credentials due to improper input validation, aka SQL In…

published 2020-12-18 5y ago modified 2026-06-17 4mo ago also EUVD-2020-18287

cvss: 7.2; version 3.1, NVD
cisa kev: Not listed; not in CISA's catalog
epss: 0.9%; EPSS 0.9% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 59%
public exploits: 0; none known

The SAS portal of Mitel MiCollab before 9.2 could allow an attacker to access user credentials due to improper input validation, aka SQL Injection.

Patch / fix

fixed in 1

mitel micollab 9.2

Is CVE-2020-25608 in your stack? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.

Check with Fencer

Exploit prediction

0.90% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 59% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-09).

CVSS scores

assigned by	version	score	vector
NVD	3.1	7.2	CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
NVD	2.0	6.5	AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P

Classification

Weakness

CWE-20 Improper Input Validation
CWE-89 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command

References

mitel.com /support/security-advisories
vendor-advisory

Sources

CVE List CVE-2020-25608
NVD CVE-2020-25608

Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.