Skip to content
Fencer Intel
high 7.6

CVE-2020-26832 json

SAP AS ABAP (SAP Landscape Transformation), versions - 2011_1_620, 2011_1_640, 2011_1_700, 2011_1_710, 2011_1_730, 2011_1_731, 2011_1_752,…

published 5y ago modified 4mo ago also EUVD-2020-19368

cvss
7.6
version 3.0, CNA
cisa kev
Not listed
not in CISA's catalog
epss
2.2%
EPSS 2.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 82%
public exploits
0
none known

Summary

SAP AS ABAP (SAP Landscape Transformation), versions - 2011_1_620, 2011_1_640, 2011_1_700, 2011_1_710, 2011_1_730, 2011_1_731, 2011_1_752, 2020 and SAP S4 HANA (SAP Landscape Transformation), versions - 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, allows a high privileged user to execute a RFC function module to which access should be restricted, however due to missing authorization an attacker can get access to some sensitive internal information of vulnerable SAP system or to make vulnerable SAP systems completely unavailable.

Is CVE-2020-26832 in your stack? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.

Check with Fencer

Exploit prediction

2.19% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 82% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-09).

Exploits and checks

  • seclists.org http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/May/42 referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified
  • packetstormsecurity.com http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/167229/SAP-Application-Server-ABAP-ABAP-Platform-Code-Injection-SQL-Injection-Missing-Authorization.html referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified

CVSS scores

assigned by version score vector
CNA 3.0 7.6 CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:H
NVD 3.1 7.6 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:H
NVD 2.0 7.5 AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:C

Affected products

  • SAP SE SAP NetWeaver AS ABAP (SAP Landscape Transformation)
  • SAP SE SAP S4 HANA (SAP Landscape Transformation)

Classification

Weakness

References

Sources

Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.