Skip to content
Fencer Intel
critical 9.6

CVE-2022-2733 in the critical feed json

Cross-site Scripting (XSS) - Reflected in openemr/openemr

published 4y ago modified 4mo ago also EUVD-2022-34975

cvss
9.6
version 3.0, CNA
cisa kev
Not listed
not in CISA's catalog
epss
95.9%
EPSS 95.9% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 99.8%
public exploits
0
none known, plus a Nuclei check

Summary

Cross-site Scripting (XSS) - Reflected in GitHub repository openemr/openemr prior to 7.0.0.1.

Patch / fix

  • openemr openemr/openemr 7.0.0.1

Is CVE-2022-2733 in your stack? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.

Check with Fencer

Exploit prediction

95.86% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 99.8% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-09).

Exploits and checks

  • Nuclei template Openemr < 7.0.0.1 - Cross-Site Scripting nuclei detection template
  • huntr.dev https://huntr.dev/bounties/25b91301-dfb0-4353-a732-e051bbe8420c referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified

CVSS scores

assigned by version score vector
CNA 3.0 9.6 CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
NVD 3.1 6.1 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Affected products

  • openemr openemr/openemr

Classification

Weakness
  • CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation

References

Sources

Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.