CVE-2022-35411 in the critical feed json
rpc.py vulnerable to Deserialization of Untrusted Data
published 4y ago modified 4mo ago also GHSA-8rq8-f485-7v8x , PYSEC-2026-526 , EUVD-2022-6297
- cvss
- 9.8
- version 3.1, NVD
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- 46.6%
- EPSS 46.6% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 98%
- public exploits
- 1
- Exploit-DB
Summary
rpc.py through 0.6.0 allows Remote Code Execution because an unpickle occurs when the "serializer: pickle" HTTP header is sent. In other words, although JSON (not Pickle) is the default data format, an unauthenticated client can cause the data to be processed with unpickle.
Patch / fix
Is CVE-2022-35411 in your dependencies? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.
Check with FencerTimeline
- Published
- First public exploit (EDB-50983)
Exploit prediction
46.65% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 98% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-09).
Exploits and checks
- EDB-50983 rpc.py 0.6.0 - Remote Code Execution (RCE) remote, 2022-07-29
- medium.com https://medium.com/%40elias.hohl/remote-code-execution-0-day-in-rpc-py-709c76690c30 referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified
- github.com https://github.com/ehtec/rpcpy-exploit referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified
- packetstormsecurity.com http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/167872/rpc.py-0.6.0-Remote-Code-Execution.html referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified
CVSS scores
| assigned by | version | score | vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVD | 3.1 | 9.8 | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H |
| NVD | 2.0 | 7.5 | AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P |
| OSV | 3.1 | 9.8 | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H |
| GitHub | 3.1 | 9.8 | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H |
Affected packages
| ecosystem | package | affected | fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| pypi | rpc-py | >=0.4.2, <=0.6.0 |
no fix listed |
Classification
References
-
github.com
/abersheeran/rpc.py/commit/491e7a841ed9a754796d6ab047a9fb16e23bf8bd
web, patch, third-party-advisory
-
medium.com
/%40elias.hohl/remote-code-execution-0-day-in-rpc-py-709c76690c30
web, exploit
-
github.com
/ehtec/rpcpy-exploit
web, exploit, third-party-advisory
-
packetstormsecurity.com
/files/167872/rpc.py-0.6.0-Remote-Code-Execution.html
web, exploit, third-party-advisory, vdb-entry
-
nvd.nist.gov
/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-35411
advisory
-
github.com
/abersheeran/rpc.py/issues/22
web
-
github.com
/abersheeran/rpc.py
package
-
medium.com
/@elias.hohl/remote-code-execution-0-day-in-rpc-py-709c76690c30
web
-
pypi.org
/project/rpc-py
package
-
github.com
/advisories/GHSA-8rq8-f485-7v8x
advisory
Sources
- CVE List CVE-2022-35411
- GitHub Advisory GHSA-8rq8-f485-7v8x
- NVD CVE-2022-35411
- OSV PYSEC-2026-526
Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.