CVE-2024-23824 json
mailcow ipixel flood attack leads to Denial of Service in admin page
published 2y ago modified 4mo ago also EUVD-2024-21271
- cvss
- 4.7
- version 3.1, CNA
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- 0.6%
- EPSS 0.6% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 49%
- public exploits
- 0
- none known
Summary
mailcow is a dockerized email package, with multiple containers linked in one bridged network. The application is vulnerable to pixel flood attack, once the payload has been successfully uploaded in the logo the application goes slow and doesn't respond in the admin page. It is tested on the versions 2023-12a and prior and patched in version 2024-01.
Patch / fix
Is CVE-2024-23824 in your stack? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.
Check with FencerCISA SSVC
- Exploitation
- Proof of concept is public
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
- Assessed
- 2y ago
Exploit prediction
0.60% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 49% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-11).
Exploits and checks
- github.com https://github.com/0xbunniee/MailCow-Pixel-Flood-Attack referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified
CVSS scores
| assigned by | version | score | vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNA | 3.1 | 4.7 | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L |
| NVD | 3.1 | 2.7 | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L |
Affected products
- mailcow mailcow-dockerized
Classification
- Weakness
-
- CWE-400 Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
References
-
github.com
/mailcow/mailcow-dockerized/commit/7f6f7e0e9ff608618e5b144bcf18d279610aa3ed
patch
-
github.com
/0xbunniee/MailCow-Pixel-Flood-Attack
exploit, third-party-advisory
-
github.com
/mailcow/mailcow-dockerized/security/advisories/GHSA-45rv-3c5p-w4h7
vendor-advisory
Sources
- CVE List CVE-2024-23824
- NVD CVE-2024-23824
Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.