CVE-2024-6244 json
pz-frontend-manager < 1.0.6 - CSRF change user profile picture
published 2y ago modified 4mo ago also EUVD-2024-47372
- cvss
- 8.8
- version 3.1, CNA
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- 3.5%
- EPSS 3.5% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 89%
- public exploits
- 1
- Exploit-DB
Summary
The PZ Frontend Manager WordPress plugin before 1.0.6 does not have CSRF checks in some places, which could allow attackers to make logged in users perform unwanted actions via CSRF attacks
Patch / fix
- Unknown PZ Frontend Manager 1.0.6
- wordpress_plugin pz_frontend_manager 1.0.6
Is CVE-2024-6244 in your stack? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.
Check with FencerTimeline
- Published
- First public exploit (EDB-52153)
CISA SSVC
- Exploitation
- Proof of concept is public
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
- Assessed
- 2y ago
Exploit prediction
3.54% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 89% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-11).
Exploits and checks
- EDB-52153 PZ Frontend Manager WordPress Plugin 1.0.5 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) webapps, 2025-04-09
- wpscan.com https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/73ba55a5-6cff-40fc-9686-30c50f060732/ referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified
CVSS scores
| assigned by | version | score | vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| CISA ADP | 3.1 | 8.8 | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H |
| NVD | 3.1 | 8.8 | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H |
| CNA | 3.1 | 8.8 | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H |
Affected products
- Unknown PZ Frontend Manager
- wordpress_plugin pz_frontend_manager
Classification
- Weakness
-
- CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery
- Technology feeds
References
-
wpscan.com
/vulnerability/73ba55a5-6cff-40fc-9686-30c50f060732/
exploit, vdb-entry, technical-description, third-party-advisory
Sources
- CVE List CVE-2024-6244
- NVD CVE-2024-6244
Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.