CVE-2025-38224 json
can: kvaser_pciefd: refine error prone echo_skb_max handling logic
published last yr. modified 3mo ago also EUVD-2025-20032
- cvss
- 7.8
- version 3.1, CNA
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- 0.2%
- EPSS 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 7%
- public exploits
- 0
- none known
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
can: kvaser_pciefd: refine error prone echo_skb_max handling logic
echo_skb_max should define the supported upper limit of echo_skb[] allocated inside the netdevice's priv. The corresponding size value provided by this driver to alloc_candev() is KVASER_PCIEFD_CAN_TX_MAX_COUNT which is 17.
But later echo_skb_max is rounded up to the nearest power of two (for the max case, that would be 32) and the tx/ack indices calculated further during tx/rx may exceed the upper array boundary. Kasan reported this for the ack case inside kvaser_pciefd_handle_ack_packet(), though the xmit function has actually caught the same thing earlier.
BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in kvaser_pciefd_handle_ack_packet+0x2d7/0x92a drivers/net/can/kvaser_pciefd.c:1528 Read of size 8 at addr ffff888105e4f078 by task swapper/4/0
CPU: 4 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/4 Not tainted 6.15.0 #12 PREEMPT(voluntary) Call Trace: <IRQ> dump_stack_lvl lib/dump_stack.c:122 print_report mm/kasan/report.c:521 kasan_report mm/kasan/report.c:634 kvaser_pciefd_handle_ack_packet drivers/net/can/kvaser_pciefd.c:1528 kvaser_pciefd_read_packet drivers/net/can/kvaser_pciefd.c:1605 kvaser_pciefd_read_buffer drivers/net/can/kvaser_pciefd.c:1656 kvaser_pciefd_receive_irq drivers/net/can/kvaser_pciefd.c:1684 kvaser_pciefd_irq_handler drivers/net/can/kvaser_pciefd.c:1733 __handle_irq_event_percpu kernel/irq/handle.c:158 handle_irq_event kernel/irq/handle.c:210 handle_edge_irq kernel/irq/chip.c:833 __common_interrupt arch/x86/kernel/irq.c:296 common_interrupt arch/x86/kernel/irq.c:286 </IRQ>
Tx max count definitely matters for kvaser_pciefd_tx_avail(), but for seq numbers' generation that's not the case - we're free to calculate them as would be more convenient, not taking tx max count into account. The only downside is that the size of echo_skb[] should correspond to the max seq number (not tx max count), so in some situations a bit more memory would be consumed than could be.
Thus make the size of the underlying echo_skb[] sufficient for the rounded max tx value.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Syzkaller.
Patch / fix
- Linux Linux 6.12.35, 6.15, 6.15.4, 6.16
- linux Debian 14, Debian 13 6.12.35-1
debian advisories DEBIAN-CVE-2025-38224
- linux-aws-6.14 Ubuntu 24.04 LTS 6.14.0-1015.15~24.04.1
- linux-gcp-6.14 Ubuntu 24.04 LTS 6.14.0-1018.19~24.04.1
- linux-oem-6.14 Ubuntu 24.04 LTS 6.14.0-1014.14
- linux-azure-6.14 Ubuntu 24.04 LTS 6.14.0-1014.14~24.04.1
- linux-riscv-6.14 Ubuntu 24.04 LTS 6.14.0-34.34.1~24.04.1
- linux-oracle-6.14 Ubuntu 24.04 LTS 6.14.0-1015.15~24.04.1
- linux-realtime-6.14 Ubuntu Pro Realtime 24.04 LTS 6.14.0-1014.14~24.04.1
ubuntu advisories UBUNTU-CVE-2025-38224
Ubuntu security data © Canonical Ltd., from https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-security-notices via OSV; changed: normalised to fixed package versions per release. CC BY-SA 4.0
- kernel-rt SLE Micro 5.2 5.3.18-150300.238.1
- kernel-source-rt SLE Micro 5.2 5.3.18-150300.238.1
- kernel-default SLE Micro 5.2 5.3.18-150300.59.238.1
- kernel-default-base SLE Micro 5.2 5.3.18-150300.59.238.1.150300.18.142.1
- kernel-rt Linux Micro 6.2 6.12.0-160000.6.1
- kernel-64kb SLES 16.0, Linux Micro 6.2, SLES for SAP applications 16.0 6.12.0-160000.6.1
- kernel-source SLES 16.0, Linux Micro 6.2, SLES for SAP applications 16.0 6.12.0-160000.6.1
- kernel-default SLES 16.0, SLE High Availability Extension 16.0, Linux Micro 6.2 +1 more 6.12.0-160000.6.1
suse advisories SUSE-SU-2026:0961-1SUSE-SU-2026:0928-1SUSE-SU-2025:21074-1SUSE-SU-2025:21139-1SUSE-SU-2026:20560-1SUSE-SU-2025:21179-1
- kernel-rt openSUSE Leap 16.0 6.12.0-160000.6.1
- dtb-aarch64 openSUSE Leap 16.0 6.12.0-160000.6.1
- kernel-64kb openSUSE Leap 16.0 6.12.0-160000.6.1
- kernel-syms openSUSE Leap 16.0 6.12.0-160000.6.1
- kernel-obs-qa openSUSE Leap 16.0 6.12.0-160000.6.1
- kernel-source openSUSE Leap 16.0 6.12.0-160000.6.1
- kernel-default openSUSE Leap 16.0 6.12.0-160000.6.1
- kernel-kvmsmall openSUSE Leap 16.0 6.12.0-160000.6.1
opensuse advisories openSUSE-SU-2025:20081-1
Is CVE-2025-38224 in your stack? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.
Check with FencerVendor advisories
What the vendors themselves say about their products: affected, fixed or not affected, and what to do.
red hat product security vex CVE-2025-38224 updated
kernel: can: kvaser_pciefd: refine error prone echo_skb_max handling logic
-
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 perf, kernel, python-perf, kernel-kdump, kernel-firmware, kernel-bootwrapper, +1 more Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 perf, kernel, bpftool, kernel-rt, python-perf, kernel-kdump, +8 more Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 perf, kernel, bpftool, kernel-rt, kernel-core, kernel-tools, +29 more Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 rv, perf, rtla, kernel, bpftool, libperf, +83 more Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 kernelnot affected: vulnerable code not present
Red Hat CSAF VEX © Red Hat, Inc., from https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/; changed: reduced to product statuses and remediations. CC BY 4.0 · csaf
Exploit prediction
0.18% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 7% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-09).
CVSS scores
| assigned by | version | score | vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNA | 3.1 | 7.8 | CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H |
| NVD | 3.1 | 7.1 | CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H |
Affected products
- Linux Linux
Classification
- Weakness
-
- CWE-125 Out-of-bounds Read
- Technology feeds
References
Sources
- CVE List CVE-2025-38224
- NVD CVE-2025-38224
Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.