CVE-2025-56802 json
The Reolink desktop application uses a hard-coded and predictable AES encryption key to encrypt user configuration files allowing attackers…
published last yr. modified 4d ago also EUVD-2025-35218
- cvss
- 5.1
- version 3.1, CNA
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- 0.1%
- EPSS 0.1% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 2%
- public exploits
- 0
- none known
Summary
The Reolink desktop application uses a hard-coded and predictable AES encryption key to encrypt user configuration files allowing attackers with local access to decrypt sensitive application data stored in %APPDATA%. A different vulnerability than CVE-2025-56801. NOTE: the Supplier's position is that material is not hardcoded and is instead randomly generated on each installation of the application.
Is CVE-2025-56802 in your stack? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.
Check with FencerCISA SSVC
- Exploitation
- Proof of concept is public
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
- Assessed
- last yr.
Exploit prediction
0.13% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 2% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-09).
Exploits and checks
- shinycolumn.notion.site https://shinycolumn.notion.site/reolink-aes-key referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified
- github.com https://github.com/shinyColumn/CVE-2025-56802 referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified
CVSS scores
| assigned by | version | score | vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| CISA ADP | 3.1 | 5.1 | CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L |
| CNA | 3.1 | 5.1 | CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L |
Classification
- Weakness
-
- CWE-321 Use of Hard-coded Cryptographic Key
References
-
shinycolumn.notion.site
/reolink-aes-key
exploit, third-party-advisory
-
github.com
/shinyColumn/CVE-2025-56802
exploit, third-party-advisory
Sources
- CVE List CVE-2025-56802
- NVD CVE-2025-56802
Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.